Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944697›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2017

An Assessment of International Family Medicine Faculty Development Priorities: Perspectives From the American Academy of Family Physicians Global Health Workshop.

Esther M Johnston, Daria Szkwarko, Ann E Evensen, David Klee, Olga Valdman, William E Cayley, Fadya El Rayess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esther M JohnstonNational Family Medicine Residency at HealthPoint, Auburn, WA.
Daria SzkwarkoUniversity of Massachusetts, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, and Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University.
Ann E EvensenUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
David KleeMichigan State University, and Munson Family Medicine Residency, Traverse City, MI.
Olga ValdmanUniversity of Massachusetts.
William E CayleyUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, and Prevea Family Medicine Residency.
Fadya El RayessAlpert School of Medicine, Brown University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe proliferation of new family medicine training programs across the globe has increased the demand for faculty development (FD) opportunities in international settings. US-based faculty may partner with international colleagues to support FD. In 2016, the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine Global Health Educators Collaborative (STFM-GHEC) began to develop a toolkit of low-cost FD resources for this purpose. To ensure that the resources appropriately target current FD needs, STFM-GHEC organized a session at the 2016 American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Global Health Workshop (GHW) to collect feedback from internationally-based and US-based faculty.

methodsThe authors presented a list of faculty development topics to attendees of an AAFP GHW session entitled "Global Faculty Development Tool Kit" on September 8, 2016, in Atlanta, Georgia. Workshop participants voted up to five times each using sticky notes for the topics they felt were of greatest need.

resultsForty-five participants cast 157 votes (34 from internationally-based faculty, 123 from US-based faculty). The combined group ranked curriculum development, program evaluation, and teaching methods as the most important FD needs. Both groups identified assessment strategy and time management among the least important FD needs. Other topics such as technology training and research design varied widely between the two groups in relative importance.

conclusionsThis pilot demonstrates that US-based and internationally-based family medicine faculty may differ in their perceived FD needs. This exercise may be utilized by future members in global health partnerships to understand and prioritize faculty development needs.

Identifiers

PMID32944697
PMCPMC7490176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.