ArticleJournal of cognition2020
Towards a New Model of Verbal Monitoring.
Article in Journal of cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Behavioral-Based Sorting of Single-Trial EEG Data Reveals Evidence for ERP Correlates of Facilitation and Interference in the Picture-Word Interference Task.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Cortico-Cerebellar Monitoring of Speech Sequence Production.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Listening to Yourself and Watching Your Tongue: Distinct Abilities and Brain Regions for Monitoring Semantic and Phonological Speech Errors.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- Semantic interference affects speech production by increasing disfluencies, not errors.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- From self-regulated learning to computer-delivered integrated speaking testing: Does monitoring always monitor?Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Article
- Domain-general conflict monitoring predicts neural and behavioral indices of linguistic error processing during reading comprehension.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2022Article
- Interference in the shared-Stroop task: a comparison of self- and other-monitoring.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Structural disconnection of the posterior medial frontal cortex reduces speech error monitoring.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Speech dysfunction, cognition, and Parkinson's disease.Progress in brain research · 2022Review
- Correction Without Consciousness in Complex Tasks: Evidence from Typing.Journal of cognition · 2021Article
- Cerebellar and Cortical Correlates of Internal and External Speech Error Monitoring.Cerebral cortex communications · 2021Article
- Self-Monitoring in Speech Production: Comprehending the Conflict Between Conflict- and Comprehension-Based Accounts.Journal of cognition · 2020Article
- A Comprehension- or a Production-Based Monitor? Response to Roelofs (2020).Journal of cognition · 2020Article
- The role of the left posterior temporal cortex in speech monitoring.Cognitive neuropsychologyArticle
- Why Stuttering Occurs: The Role of Cognitive Conflict and Control.Topics in language disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As all human activities, verbal communication is fraught with errors. It is estimated that humans produce around 16,000 words per day, but the word that is selected for production is not always correct and neither is the articulation always flawless. However, to facilitate communication, it is important to limit the number of errors. This is accomplished via the verbal monitoring mechanism. A body of research over the last century has uncovered a number of properties of the mechanisms at work during verbal monitoring. Over a dozen routes for verbal monitoring have been postulated. However, to date a complete account of verbal monitoring does not exist. In the current paper we first outline the properties of verbal monitoring that have been empirically demonstrated. This is followed by a discussion of current verbal monitoring models: the perceptual loop theory, conflict monitoring, the hierarchical state feedback control model, and the forward model theory. Each of these models is evaluated given empirical findings and theoretical considerations. We then outline lacunae of current theories, which we address with a proposal for a new model of verbal monitoring for production and perception, based on conflict monitoring models. Additionally, this novel model suggests a mechanism of how a detected error leads to a correction. The error resolution mechanism proposed in our new model is then tested in a computational model. Finally, we outline the advances and predictions of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.