Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944664›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Onset times and duration of analgesic effect of various concentrations of local anesthetic solutions in standardized volume used for brachial plexus blocks.

Robert Almasi, Barbara Rezman, Zsofia Kriszta, Balazs Patczai, Norbert Wiegand, Lajos Bogar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05834023 (Comparison Between Bupivacaine 0.5% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Lidocaine 1% in Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05834023 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Bupivacaine 0.5% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% Plus Lidocaine 1% in Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de San Carlos Dr. Benicio Arzola MedinaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsPain, Acute, Postoperative Pain, AnalgesiaArmsBupivacaine-Lidocaine, Bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert AlmasiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.
Barbara RezmanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.
Zsofia KrisztaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.
Balazs PatczaiDepartment of Traumatology and Hand Surgery, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.
Norbert WiegandDepartment of Traumatology and Hand Surgery, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.
Lajos BogarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Pecs Medical School, 7624, Pécs Ifjuság u.13, Hungary.
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visualization of the nerve structures of brachial plexus allows anesthesiologists to use a lower dose of local anesthetics. The content of this low dose is not unequivocal, consequently, the pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics used by various authors are difficult to compare. In this study, the onset times and duration of the analgesic effect of local anesthetic mixture solutions used for brachial plexus blocks are investigated and the quality of anesthesia is compared. 85 unpremedicated American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III, 19-83-year-old patients scheduled for upper limb trauma surgery are assigned to four groups for the axillary-supraclavicular block with lidocaine 1% and bupivacaine 0,5% 1:1 mixture (Group LB) or bupivacaine 0.33% (Group BS) or lidocaine 0,66% (Group LS) or bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1% 2:1 mixture (Group BL). 0.4 ml/kg was administered to the four groups. The onset time was significantly shorter in the lidocaine group (LS 13.0 ± 1.02) than in the other study groups (LB 16.64 ± 0.89; BS 17.21 ± 0.74; BL 16.92 ± 0.51 min ±SEM, p = 0.002). No differences were observed in the onset times between LB, BS, and BL groups (p > 0.05). Statistical differences were found in the duration of local anesthetics between LB (392.9 ± 20.4), BS (546.4 ± 14.9), LS (172.85 ± 7.8), and BL (458.7 ± 11.9 min ±SEM, p = 0.001). Lidocaine does not shorten the onset times, but significantly decreases the duration of action of bupivacaine when used in mixture solutions. Lidocaine exhibits a good quality of block in the applied dose, while other solutions have excellent quality. Bupivacaine without lidocaine has the longest duration of action to achieve the longest postoperative analgesia.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaCritical careDuration of action local anestheticsIntensive care medicineMedical imagingMixture of local anestheticsOnset time of local anestheticsPain managementPain researchPatient satisfaction regional anaesthesiaQuality improvement anesthesiaTraumaUltrasound guidance in regional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID32944664
PMCPMC7481523
OpenAlexW3081663094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.