ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2020
Real-Time Visual Feedback Device Improves Quality Of Chest Compressions: A Manikin Study.
Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using an audiovisual feedback device improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during day and night - a randomized controlled simulation study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Trial
- Survival to intensive care unit discharge among in-hospital cardiac arrest patients by applying audiovisual feedback device.ESC heart failure · 2021Trial
- Impact of a Real-Time Feedback Device on the Quality of Chest Compressions Performed by Laypersons: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Identifying clinical error patterns in nursing students' CPR performance: a mixed-methods OSCE study.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Effect of blindfolding the lead resuscitator on frequency of closed-loop communication during veterinary cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized, controlled pilot study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Paediatric chest compression performance improves via novel augmented-reality cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback system: A mixed-methods pilot study in a simulation-based setting.Resuscitation plus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a real-time visual feedback device on Chest comparison (CCs) rate and depth delivered by healthcare professionals.
methodsIn a simulated scenario a sensor was placed on a manikin's chest and connected to a defibrillator which provided real-time visual feedback on the rate and depth of CCs. Thirty-two healthcare professionals performed sequentially 5 cycles of 30 CCs without (FeedOFF) and with (FeedON) feedback. CCs with a depth between 50 and 60mm and a rate between 100 and 120cpm were considered optimal.
resultsVisual feedback resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of CCs with optimal depth (median 8.7 [interquartile range 0.7-55.5]% FeedOFF vs 63.3 [17.6-88.1]% FeedON, p=0.002) and optimal rate (median 51.3 [1.3 - 81.3]% FeedOFF vs 68.3 [45.3 - 86.1]% FeedON,
conclusionsIn the absence of visual feedback, there is a tendency towards lower depth and higher rate of CCs. The use of feedback technology significantly improves the quality of CCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.