Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944535›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2020

Clinical efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery for patients treated with radical cystectomy and ileal urinary diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Dechao Feng, Shengzhuo Liu, Yiping Lu, Wuran Wei, Ping Han

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Enhanced recovery after surgery-Does the ERAS concept keep its promises].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dechao FengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shengzhuo LiuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yiping LuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wuran WeiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ping HanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and ileal urinary diversion (IUD). We performed a literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and three main Chinese databases (WANFANG, CNKI and VIP) in December 2019 without language restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies, evaluated methodological quality and extracted data using Cochrane Collaboration's tools. Efficacy was assessed by the time to first flatus, first bowel movement, and hospitalization time. Safety was assessed by 30-day readmission and complications after surgery. Our searches identified 6 studies, including 628 patients. A total of 323 (51%) patients took ERAS. We observed that ERAS reduced the time to first flatus [standard mean difference (SMD): -1.65, 95% CI: -2.63 to -0.68, P=0.0009], first bowel movement (SMD: -1.14, 95% CI: -1.78 to -0.50, P=0.0005), and hospitalization time (MD: -4.09, 95% CI: -6.34 to -1.85, P=0.0004). We did not detect significant difference in terms of 30-day readmission [relative risk (RR): 1.33, 95% CI: 0.61-2.88, P=0.48] and postoperative complications (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.65-1.26, P=0.56) between ERAS and conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS). Our findings indicated that ERAS protocols throughout the perioperative period of RC with IUD might reduce hospitalization expenses and contribute to higher turnover ward, more efficient utilization of medical resources and lower risk of nosocomial infection as a result of shorter length of stay. Besides, early rehabilitation of gastrointestinal function might not only facilitate wound healing and early mobilization, thereby reducing the incidence of basic complications such as cardiopulmonary disease, but also improve patients' psychological trauma and stress response, increase self-confidence and motivation in treatments, and then lead to unexpected benefits. Further large volume, multicenter randomized controlled studies are warranted before making the final clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

bladder cancerEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)radical cystectomy (RC)randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Identifiers

PMID32944535
PMCPMC7475686
OpenAlexW3041054293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.