Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944418›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Mimicking prophage induction in the body: induction in the lab with pH gradients.

Taylor Miller-Ensminger, Andrea Garretto, Nicole Stark, Catherine Putonti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prophage: agent provocateur?Archives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dietary Effects on the Gut Phageome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taylor Miller-EnsmingerBioinformatics Program, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Andrea GarrettoBioinformatics Program, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Nicole StarkDepartment of Biology, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Catherine PutontiBioinformatics Program, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Loyola University Chicago · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of bacteria within the human body are lysogens, often harboring multiple bacteriophage sequences (prophages) within their genomes. While several different types of environmental stresses can trigger or induce prophages to enter into the lytic cycle, they have yet to be fully explored and understood in the human microbiota. In the laboratory, the most common induction method is the DNA damaging chemical Mitomycin C. Although pH has been listed in the literature as an induction method, it is not widely used. Here, we detail a protocol for prophage induction by culture under different pH conditions. We explored the effects of pH on prophage induction in bacterial isolates from the bladder, where the pH is well documented to vary significantly between individuals as well as between healthy individuals and individuals with urinary tract symptoms or disease. Using this protocol, we successfully induced phages from seven bladder

Indexed as

BacteriophageInductionLysogenspH

Identifiers

PMID32944418
PMCPMC7469935
OpenAlexW3081892367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.