Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944357›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020

The public health response to the COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China: a narrative review.

Mark Zanin, Cheng Xiao, Tingting Liang, Shiman Ling, Fengming Zhao, Zhenting Huang, Fangmei Lin, Xia Lin, Zhanpeng Jiang, Sook-San Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Public Health Measures and the Control of COVID-19 in China.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Review
  9. Waste management model for COVID-19: recommendations for future threats.International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health Services Utilization in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from a Large-Scale Online Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mark ZaninState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng XiaoState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tingting LiangState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shiman LingState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fengming ZhaoState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenting HuangState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fangmei LinState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xia LinState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhanpeng JiangState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sook-San WongState-Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused nations to adopt unprecedented control measures in order to curb its spread. As the first nation to respond, China's aggressive control measures appeared to have been effective in suppressing the first wave and keeping new cases under control. Here, we provide the historical context and details of China's public health response to COVID-19. We highlight the lessons and impact of the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak, which demonstrated the importance of transparency, surveillance and testing laboratories during an outbreak. We provide an overview of China's response strategy that was based on the principles of early detection, isolation, management and treatment and involved not only the large-scale coordination of multiple governmental bodies but also grass-root community participation throughout the country. These community-based organizations conducted active surveillance for febrile cases and provided support for those in quarantine and communities in lockdown. Importantly, these broader measures were supported by digital technology, including the extensive use of internet-based platforms and mobile applications (APPs). While there have been no significant increases in case numbers since April, there is still much concern over a second wave, considering the resumption of work and school, the lifting of travel restrictions and the outbreaks occurring globally. Control measures has since been implemented by provincial authorities, which includes continued surveillance and rapid testing. Although China's strict control measures may not suit every nation, the principles of early detection and isolation continue to hold true and have been a cornerstone of the initial and ongoing response to the COVID-19.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19pandemicpublic healthSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Identifiers

PMID32944357
PMCPMC7475588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.