ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2020
Efficient isolation and quantification of circulating tumor cells in non-small cell lung cancer patients using peptide-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in integrated biophysical and biochemical microfluidic methods for circulating tumor cells isolation and analysis.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- A Novel Microfluidic Platform for Circulating Tumor Cell Identification in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Peptide-Functionalized Nanomedicine: Advancements in Drug Delivery, Diagnostics, and Biomedical Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- [Recent advances in responsive isolation, release and clinical application of circulating tumor cells].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024Review
- Recent Advancements of Nanomedicine in Breast Cancer Surgery.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Recent Update Roles of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC)/Non-CTC Separation.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Photo-functionalized TiOFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- The therapeutic effect of PEI-FeFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The emerging nanomedicine-based technology for non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: how far are we from an effective treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Harnessing the Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles for Biomedical Applications Using Multifunctional Magnetic Nanomaterials.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022Review
- SimultaneousAnnals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Circulating tumor cells: biology and clinical significance.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Review
- Rationale for Early Detection ofCancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) carry a wealth of information on primary and metastatic tumors critical for enhancing the understanding of the occurrence, progression and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the low sensitivity of traditional tumor detection methods limits the application of CTCs in the treatment and disease surveillance of NSCLC. Therefore, CTCs isolation and detection with high sensitivity is highly desired especially for NSCLC patients, which is significant because of high occurrence and mortality. While it is very challenging because of the lower expression of CTC positive biomarkers such as epithelial cell adhesion molecules and cytokeratins (EpCAM and CKs), herein we report a method based on peptide-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles with high CTC capture efficiency, which demonstrates superiority in NSCLC clinical applications.
methodsFor analysis and comparison of the peptide-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (TumorFisher, Nanopep Corp.) and the antibody-modified magnetic beads (CellSearch, Janssen Diagnostics, LLC), two NSCLC cell lines, A549 and NCI-H1975 were chosen to measure the binding affinity and capture efficiency. In order to compare the effect of the clinical application of these two detection systems, 7 early stage patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. To further explore the clinical utility of CTC counting in different stages, 81 NSCLC patients in stage I-IV were enrolled for CTC enumeration and statistical analysis.
resultsThe binding affinities of the recognition peptide to A549 and NCI-H1975 are 76.7%±11.0% and 70.1%±4.8%, respectively, which is similar with the positive control group (anti-EpCAM antibodies). CTCs were captured in 5/7 (71.4%) of early stage NSCLC patients with NSCLC in TumorFisher system, which is higher than CellSearch, and the false negative of TumorFisher is much lower than CellSearch. In a larger clinical cohort, the CTC numbers of NSCLC patients varied in different stages and the overall detection rate of TumorFisher was 59/81 (72.8%), with the similar proportion in stage I (21/29, 72.4%), II (17/22, 77.3%) and III (16/21, 76.2%).
conclusionsHighly efficient CTC isolation technique based on peptide-magnetic nanoparticles was firstly applied in NSCLC patients. Compared with the antibody-based the technique, the higher CTC detection rates (71.4%) in NSCLC patient blood samples were demonstrated for the patients in different stages, I-IV, especially in early stages. This indicates the feasibility of the clinical utility of this new technique in early stage screening, prognosis and therapy evaluation of NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.