Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944275›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Evaluation of a clinical pharmacist team-based telehealth intervention in a rural clinic setting: a pilot study of feasibility, organizational perceptions, and return on investment.

Logan T Murry, Christopher P Parker, Rachel J Finkelstein, Matthew Arnold, Korey Kennelty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Logan T MurryCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, 180 S. Grand Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0345-6997
Christopher P ParkerCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, 180 S. Grand Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA.
Rachel J FinkelsteinCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, 180 S. Grand Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA.
Matthew ArnoldGenesis Health System, 1345 West Central Park, Davenport, IA 52804 USA.
Korey KenneltyCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, 180 S. Grand Ave, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA.
University of Iowa · USGenesis Health System · US

Funding

MEDication Focused Outpatient Care for Underutilization of Secondary PreventionR18HL116259 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI COFFEY, CHRISTOPHER S., KENNELTY, KOREY A · 2014 to 2018
$8.8M
Dissemination of the Cardiovascular Risk Service (CVRS Live)R01HL139918 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KENNELTY, KOREY A · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Improved Cardiovascular Risk Reduction to Enhance Rural Primary Care:I-CARER01HL116311 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KENNELTY, KOREY A, LEVY, BARCEY THURSTON · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116311NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139918NHLBI NIH HHS R18 HL116259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote, centralized clinical pharmacist services provided by board-certified clinical pharmacists have been shown to effectively assist in chronic disease management. We assess the feasibility of implementing a pharmacist-led, remote, centralized pharmacy service to improve A1c levels in patient with diabetes in a rural clinic setting.

methodsThis was a non-randomized pilot and feasibility study. Participants were enrolled in a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention service, with data prior to enrollment used as baseline data for control. To be included, patients needed to have A1c readings of greater than 7% to be considered uncontrolled. A1c changes were reported for two groups based on A1c ranges: between 7 and 10% and ≥ 10%. Clinical pharmacists and clinical pharmacy interns initiated contact with patients via telephone communication and managed the patients remotely. The following outcomes were evaluated: organization perceptions (patients, providers, and clinic staff), changes in A1c, medication discrepancies, impact of an internally operated Patient Assistance Program, and potential return on investment (ROI).

resultsFifty-two patients were initially identified and referred to the service with 43 patients consenting to participate in the intervention. Patient and provider survey responses were recorded. In the initial analysis occurring during the first 3 to 5 months of the program, there was considerable improvement in diabetes control as measured by A1c. For patients with uncontrolled diabetes with a baseline A1c > 7% but less than < 10% and ≥ 10%, the intervention resulted in an A1c decrease of 0.57% and 2.55%, respectively. Clinical pharmacists and clinical pharmacy interns identified at least one medication discrepancy in 44% of patients, with number of discrepancies ranging from 1 to 5 per patient. At the conclusion of the study window, 42 potentially billable encounters were documented, which would have generated a net profit of $1140 USD, had they been submitted for reimbursement. Given the potential revenue generation, the service theoretically yields a ROI of 1.4 to 1.

conclusionsInitial results suggest that a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention has potential to decrease A1c levels in patients with diabetes, assist in identification of medication discrepancies, provide a positive return on investment for rural clinics, and potentially increase reimbursement for providers and clinics tasked with managing patients with uncontrolled diabetes.

Indexed as

DiabetesFamily medicinePharmacistsPilotRemote pharmacy serviceReturn on investmentRuralTeam-based careTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID32944275
PMCPMC7488227
OpenAlexW3085828280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.