Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944084›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2020

The prophylactic effects of BIFICO on the antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and gut microbiota.

Jiannong Wu, Tieer Gan, Ying Zhang, Guolian Xia, Shu Deng, Xin Lv, Bingxin Zhang, Bin Lv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiannong WuDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Tieer GanDepartment of Infection Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Ying ZhangCenter of Clinical Evaluation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Guolian XiaDepartment of Critical Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Shu DengDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Xin LvDepartment of Pneumology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Bingxin ZhangDepartment of Pneumology, Fuyang District People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, China.
Bin LvDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 54 Youdian RoadZhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310009 China.ORCID 0000-0002-5453-306X
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNFuyang City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate the prophylactic effects of probiotic mixture BIFICO on antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis (AIGD) and the influence on the change of the gut microbiota.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study and divided 196 patients who required intravenous beta-lactam antibiotics into three groups: a control group (no probiotics), a regular group (840 mg of BIFICO), and a double-dosage group (1680 mg of BIFICO). The symptoms of antibiotic-related diarrhea, bloating and abdominal pain and the incidence of AIGD were evaluated 7 days and 8-14 days after antibiotic use, with 10 patients in each group. 16S rDNA sequencing was performed to detect changes of the gut microbiota.

resultsWithin 7 days of the initiation of antibiotic treatment, the incidences of AIGD in the control group, regular group (840 mg of BIFICO), and double-dosage group (1680 mg of BIFICO) were 21.88%, 14.93%, and 6.15% respectively. On days of 8-14th, the incidences of AIGD in the control group, regular group, and double-dosage group were 25%, 14.93%, and 4.62%, respectively. The incidence of AIGD in the double-dosage group within 7 days and 14 days were both significantly lower than that in relevant control group (P < 0.05). On day 14, the incidence of AIGD in the double-dosage group was lower than that in the regular group (P < 0.05). The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the control group after antibiotic treatment was significantly reduced compared to that prior to treatment, while those of the regular and double-dosage groups were stable. The species abundance, especially

conclusionsBIFICO may reduce the occurrence of AIGD in a dose-dependent manner and can stabilize the gut microbiota balance.

Indexed as

16S rDNA sequencingAIGDAntibioticsBIFICOGut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID32944084
PMCPMC7488247
OpenAlexW3086687313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.