ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
IS (Idiopathic Scoliosis) etiology: Multifactorial genetic research continues. A systematic review 1950 to 2017.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding bracing outcomes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a mixed-methods approach.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
- Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire for Sleep Apnea in Newly Diagnosed Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Idiopathic Scoliosis: Novel Challenges for Researchers and Clinicians.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Genetic variants associated with the occurrence and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIS (idiopathic scoliosis) is a common spinal condition occurring in otherwise completely healthy adolescents. The root cause of IS remains unclear. This systematic review will focus on an update of genetic factors and IS etiology. Though it is generally accepted that the condition is not due to a single gene effect, etiology studies continue looking for a root cause including genetic variants. Though susceptibility from multiple genetic components is plausible based on known family history data, the literature remains unclear regarding multifactorial genetic influences. The objective of this study was to critically evaluate the evidence behind genetic causes (not single gene) of IS through a systematic review and strength-of-study analysis of existing genetic and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We used the protocol of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
methodsPubMed was searched for the terms IS, scoliotic, spinal curve, genetic, gene, etiology, polymorphisms. Articles were assessed for risk-of-bias. Level-of-evidence grading was completed via Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. The assessment scores factor strength of a study in determining a positive or negative association to a gene etiology.
resultsAfter screening of 36 eligible papers, 8 relevant studies met inclusion criteria at this time, 3 were in favor of a genetic factor for IS, whereas 5 studies were against it.
conclusionBased on the literature analyzed, there is moderate evidence with a low risk-of-bias that does not clarify a genetic cause of IS. The 2 studies in favor of a genetic etiology were completed in homogeneous populations, limiting their generalizability. Relying on a genetic etiology alone for IS may over simplify its multifactorial nature and limit appreciation of other influences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.