Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943826›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2020

Marker aided introgression of

Bharathi Pukalenthy, Dhasarathan Manickam, Karthikeyan Adhimoolam, Sandesh Goragundi Mahesh, Nagalakshmi Ramanathan, Sarankumar Chandran, Vellaikumar Sampathrajan, Ravikesavan Rajasekaran, Kavithapushpam Arunachalam, Kalaiselvi Senthil and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bharathi PukalenthyDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu India.
Dhasarathan ManickamDepartment of Biotechnology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu India.
Karthikeyan AdhimoolamDepartment of Biotechnology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu India.
Sandesh Goragundi MaheshDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu India.
Nagalakshmi RamanathanCentre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu India.
Sarankumar ChandranDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu India.
Vellaikumar SampathrajanDepartment of Biotechnology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu India.
Ravikesavan RajasekaranDepartment of Millets, Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu India.
Kavithapushpam ArunachalamDepartment of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Killikulam, Tamil Nadu India.
Kalaiselvi SenthilDepartment of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu India.
Vignesh MuthusamyDivision of Genetics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Firoz HossainDivision of Genetics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Senthil NatesanDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu India.
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INAvinashilingam University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maize is the predominant food source for the world population, but lack of lysine and tryptophan in maize endosperm cannot fulfill the nutritional requirements of humans. Hence, the improvement of lysine and tryptophan content is the ultimate goal of maize biofortification programs. In the present study, the marker-assisted backcross (MABC) breeding strategy was used to enhance the lysine and tryptophan content of the elite maize inbred line UMI1230 by introgressing

Indexed as

BiofortificationMaizeMarker-assisted backcrossingopaque 2

Identifiers

PMID32943826
PMCPMC7468007
OpenAlexW3080106660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.