Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943812›Full record

ArticleJournal of risk and uncertainty2020

E-Cigarettes and Adult Smoking: Evidence from Minnesota.

Henry Saffer, Daniel Dench, Michael Grossman, Dhaval Dave

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of risk and uncertainty, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. E-CIGARETTE FLAVOR RESTRICTIONS' EFFECTS ON TOBACCO PRODUCT SALES.American journal of health economics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tobacco harm reduction in Afghanistan: a recipe for improving smokers' health.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Use of Vaping as a Smoking Cessation Aid: A Review of Clinical Trials.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry SafferNational Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 5 Hanover Square, 16th Floor, Suite 1602 New York, NY 10004-2630.
Daniel DenchCity University of New York Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10016.
Michael GrossmanCity University of New York Graduate Center Ph.D. Program in Economics, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10016.
Dhaval DaveBentley University Department of Economics 175 Forest St., AAC 195, Waltham, MA 02452.
National Bureau of Economic Research · USCity University of New York · USIZA - Institute of Labor Economics · DE

Funding

The Economics of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Advertising and OutcomesR01DA039968 · NIDA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI DAVE, DHAVAL M. · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarettes provide nicotine in a vapor form, which is considered less harmful than the smoke from combustible cigarettes because it does not contain the toxins that are found in tobacco smoke. E-cigarettes may be effective in helping smokers to quit or they might simply provide smokers a method of bypassing smoking restrictions. There is very little causal evidence to date on how e-cigarette use impacts smoking cessation among adults. Minnesota was the first to impose a tax on e-cigarettes. This tax provides a plausibly exogenous deterrent to e-cigarette use. We utilize data from the Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplements from 1992 to 2015 to assess how the Minnesota tax increase impacted smoking cessation among adult smokers. Estimates suggest that the e-cigarette tax increased adult smoking and reduced smoking cessation in Minnesota, relative to the control group, and imply a cross elasticity of current smoking participation with respect to e-cigarette prices of 0.13. Our results suggest that in the sample period about 32,400 additional adult smokers would have quit smoking in Minnesota in the absence of the tax. If this tax were imposed on a national level about 1.8 million smokers would be deterred from quitting in a ten year period. The taxation of e-cigarettes at the same rate as cigarettes could deter more than 2.75 million smokers nationally from quitting in the same period. The public health benefits of not taxing e-cigarettes, however, must be weighed against effects of this decision on efforts to reduce vaping by youth.

Identifiers

PMID32943812
PMCPMC7491748
OpenAlexW2996060565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.