Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943779›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2020

Locus coeruleus: a new look at the blue spot.

Gina R Poe, Stephen Foote, Oxana Eschenko, Joshua P Johansen, Sebastien Bouret, Gary Aston-Jones, Carolyn W Harley, Denise Manahan-Vaughan, David Weinshenker, Rita Valentino and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 406 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
406citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

406 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Brain-wide activity mapping reveals the somatosensory cortex as a sex-specific regulator of hedonic feeding.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

346 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gina R PoeUCLA, Integrative Biology and Physiology, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephen Foote5312 Hampden Lane, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Oxana EschenkoMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7482-5628
Joshua P JohansenRiken, Center for Brain Science, Saitama, Japan.
Sebastien BouretICM, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2279-6161
Gary Aston-JonesRutgers University, Brain Health Institute, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Carolyn W HarleyMemorial University, Newfoundland, Psychology Department, St John's, NL, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8641-7998
Denise Manahan-VaughanRuhr University Bochum, Medical Faculty, Neurophysiology, Bochum, Germany.
David WeinshenkerEmory University, Human Genetics, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rita ValentinoNIH, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Craig BerridgeUniversity Wisconsin-Madison, Psychology, Madison, WI, USA.
Daniel J ChandlerRowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Barry WaterhouseRowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Susan J SaraCollège de France, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Paris, France. susan.sara@college-de-france.fr.

Funding

REM SLEEP AND MEMORYR01MH060670 · NIMH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI POE, GINA R · 2000 to 2023
$6.4M
Enhancing the Efficiency of Non-REM Sleep Temporal Dynamics to Improve Insight LearningR21MH119020 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI POE, GINA R · 2019 to 2020
$442k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060670NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH119020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The locus coeruleus (LC), or 'blue spot', is a small nucleus located deep in the brainstem that provides the far-reaching noradrenergic neurotransmitter system of the brain. This phylogenetically conserved nucleus has proved relatively intractable to full characterization, despite more than 60 years of concerted efforts by investigators. Recently, an array of powerful new neuroscience tools have provided unprecedented access to this elusive nucleus, revealing new levels of organization and function. We are currently at the threshold of major discoveries regarding how this tiny brainstem structure exerts such varied and significant influences over brain function and behaviour. All LC neurons receive inputs related to autonomic arousal, but distinct subpopulations of those neurons can encode specific cognitive processes, presumably through more specific inputs from the forebrain areas. This ability, combined with specific patterns of innervation of target areas and heterogeneity in receptor distributions, suggests that activation of the LC has more specific influences on target networks than had initially been imagined.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitionHumansLocus CoeruleusNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsNucleus Accumbens

Identifiers

PMID32943779
PMCPMC8991985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.