Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943683›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Warfare-induced mammal population declines in Southwestern Africa are mediated by species life history, habitat type and hunter preferences.

Franciany Braga-Pereira, Carlos A Peres, João Vitor Campos-Silva, Carmen Van-Dúnem Santos, Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Franciany Braga-PereiraDepartment of Ecology and Systematics, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, 58051-900, Brazil. franbraga83@yahoo.com.br.
Carlos A PeresDepartment of Ecology and Systematics, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, 58051-900, Brazil.
João Vitor Campos-SilvaFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Science, Ås, Norway.
Carmen Van-Dúnem SantosDepartment of Biology, Universidade Agostinho Neto, Avenue 4 de Fevereiro, 000000, Luanda, Angola.
Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega AlvesDepartment of Ecology and Systematics, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, 58051-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Civil wars often coincide with global biodiversity hotspots and have plagued the everyday reality of many countries throughout human history. However, how do civil wars affect wildlife populations? Are these impacts the same in savannah and forest environments? How persistent are the post-war consequences on wildlife populations within and outside conflict zones? Long-term monitoring programs in war zones, which could answer these questions, are virtually nonexistent, not least due to the risks researchers are exposed to. In this context, only a few methodologies can provide data on wild populations during war conflicts. We used local ecological knowledge to assess the main consequences of a prolonged civil war (1975-2002) in Southwestern Africa on forest and savannah mammals. The post-war abundance in 20 of 26 (77%) mammal species considered in this study was lower in open savannah compared to the closed-canopy forest environments, with some species experiencing a decline of up to 80% of their pre-war baseline abundance. Large-bodied mammals were preferred targets and had been overhunted, but as their populations became increasingly depleted, the size structure of prey species gradually shifted towards smaller-bodied species. Finally, we present a general flow diagram of how civil wars in low-governance countries can have both positive and negative impacts on native wildlife populations at different scales of space and time.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnimalsHumansMammalsNamibiaPopulation DynamicsPredatory BehaviorWarfare

Identifiers

PMID32943683
PMCPMC7498602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.