Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943659›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The landscape of microsatellites in the enset (Ensete ventricosum) genome and web-based marker resource development.

Manosh Kumar Biswas, Jaypal N Darbar, James S Borrell, Mita Bagchi, Dhiman Biswas, Gizachew Woldesenbet Nuraga, Sebsebe Demissew, Paul Wilkin, Trude Schwarzacher, J S Heslop-Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chloroplast Genome Diversity and Marker Potentials of DiverseInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Genetic Diversity of Enset (Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Manosh Kumar BiswasDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. manosh24@yahoo.com.
Jaypal N DarbarDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
James S BorrellRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW9 3AE, Surrey, UK.
Mita BagchiDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Dhiman BiswasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Gizachew Woldesenbet NuragaDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Sebsebe DemissewDepartment of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Paul WilkinRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW9 3AE, Surrey, UK.
Trude SchwarzacherDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
J S Heslop-HarrisonDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. phh4@le.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P02307X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensete ventricosum (Musaceae, enset) is an Ethiopian food security crop. To realize the potential of enset for rural livelihoods, further knowledge of enset diversity, genetics and genomics is required to support breeding programs and conservation. This study was conducted to explore the enset genome to develop molecular markers, genomics resources, and characterize enset landraces while giving insight into the organization of the genome. We identified 233 microsatellites (simple sequence repeats, SSRs) per Mbp in the enset genome, representing 0.28% of the genome. Mono- and di-nucleotide repeats motifs were found in a higher proportion than other classes of SSR-motifs. In total, 154,586 non-redundant enset microsatellite markers (EMM) were identified and 40 selected for primer development. Marker validation by PCR and low-cost agarose gel electrophoresis revealed that 92.5% were polymorphic, showing a high PIC (Polymorphism Information Content; 0.87) and expected heterozygosity (He = 0.79-0.82). In silico analysis of genomes of closely related species showed 46.86% of the markers were transferable among enset species and 1.90% were transferable to Musa. The SSRs are robust (with basic PCR methods and agarose gel electrophoresis), informative, and applicable in measuring enset diversity, genotyping, selection and potentially breeding. Enset SSRs are available in a web-based database at https://enset-project.org/EnMom@base.html (or https://enset.aau.edu.et/index.html , downloadable from Figshare).

Indexed as

BiomarkersGenome, PlantGenomicsInternetMicrosatellite RepeatsMusaceaePolymorphism, GeneticBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32943659
PMCPMC7498607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.