Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943537›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Development of a serum miRNA panel for detection of early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Lisha Ying, Lingbin Du, Ruiyang Zou, Lei Shi, Nan Zhang, Jiaoyue Jin, Chenyang Xu, Fanrong Zhang, Chen Zhu, Junzhou Wu and 17 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisha YingCancer Research Institute, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Lingbin DuInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Ruiyang ZouMiRXES (Hangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3177-2762
Lei ShiInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Nan ZhangCancer Research Institute, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Jiaoyue JinInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Chenyang XuCancer Research Institute, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Fanrong ZhangInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Chen ZhuInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Junzhou WuCancer Research Institute, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-1743
Kaiyan ChenInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Minran HuangInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Yingxue WuCancer Research Institute, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-8827
Yimin ZhangInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Weihui ZhengInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3459-6645
Xiaodan PanInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Baofu ChenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang, China.
Aifen LinBiological Resource Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang, China.
John Kit Chung TamDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119077, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6269-3653
Rob Martinus van DamDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119077, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7354-8734
David Tien Min LaiDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119077, Singapore.
Kee Seng ChiaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 119077, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0629-5570
Lihan ZhouMiRXES (Hangzhou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China.
Heng-Phon TooDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119077, Singapore.
Herbert YuUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813.ORCID 0000-0003-3950-4815
Weimin MaoInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Dan SuInstitute of Cancer and Basic Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China; sudan@zjcc.org.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNNational University of Singapore · SGWenzhou Medical University · CNUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive testing for early detection of lung cancer to improve patient survival is a major unmet clinical need. This study aimed to develop and validate a serum multi-microRNA (multimiR) panel as a minimally invasive test for early detection of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regardless of smoking status, gender, and ethnicity. Our study included 744 NSCLC cases and 944 matched controls, including smokers and nonsmokers, male and female, with Asian and Caucasian subjects. Using RT-qPCR and a tightly controlled workflow, we quantified the absolute expression of 520 circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in a Chinese cohort of 180 early stage NSCLC cases and 216 healthy controls (male smokers). Candidate biomarkers were verified in two case-control cohorts of 432 Chinese and 218 Caucasians, respectively (including females and nonsmokers). A multimiR panel for NSCLC detection was developed using a twofold cross-validation and validated in three additional Asian cohorts comprising 642 subjects. We discovered 35 candidate miRNA biomarkers, verified 22 of them, and developed a five-miR panel that detected NSCLC with area under curve (AUC) of 0.936-0.984 in the discovery and verification cohorts. The panel was validated in three independent cohorts with AUCs of 0.973, 0.916, and 0.917. The sensitivity of five-miR test was 81.3% for all stages, 82.9% for stages I and II, and 83.0% for stage I NSCLC, when the specificity is at 90.7%. We developed a minimally invasive five-miR serum test for detecting early stage NSCLC and validated its performance in multiple patient cohorts independent of smoking status, gender, and ethnicity.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsblood biomarkerearly detectionmicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID32943537
PMCPMC7547174
OpenAlexW3087710897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.