Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943438›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020

Disparities in Cancer Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.

John M Carethers, Rajarshi Sengupta, Rea Blakey, Antoni Ribas, Gypsyamber D'Souza

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural and urban cancer patients' experiences, health behaviors, and perceptions.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

John M CarethersDepartments of Internal Medicine and Human Genetics and Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. jcarethe@umich.edu.
Rajarshi SenguptaAmerican Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rea BlakeyOncology Center of Excellence, Office of the Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Antoni RibasDepartments of Medicine, Surgery, and Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Gypsyamber D'SouzaDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-0575-7948
American Association For Cancer Research · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USLos Angeles Medical Center · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

Next Generation Cancer Immunotherapies to Defeat MelanomaR35CA197633 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ANTONI RIBAS · 2015 to 2026
$10.4M
Impacting the oral HPV continuum: prevention, screening, and early detectionR35DE026631 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI D'SOUZA, GYPSYAMBER · 2016 to 2023
$8.4M
(PQ3) Immune Modulation of DNA Mismatch Repair in Colorectal CancerR01CA206010 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CARETHERS, JOHN M · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA206010NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197633NIDCR NIH HHS R35 DE026631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for cancer is a proven and recommended approach to prevent deaths from cancer; screening can locate precursor lesions and/or cancer at early stages when it is potentially curable. Racial and ethnic minorities and other medically underserved populations exhibit lower uptake of cancer screening than nonminorities in the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic, which disproportionately affected minority communities, has curtailed preventive services including cancer screening to preserve personal protective equipment and prevent spread of infection. While there is evidence for a rebound from the pandemic-driven reduction in cancer screening nationally, the return may not be even across all populations, with minority population screening that was already behind becoming further behind as a result of the community ravages from COVID-19. Fear of contracting COVID-19, limited access to safety-net clinics, and personal factors like, financial, employment, and transportation issues are concerns that are intensified in medically underserved communities. Prolonged delays in cancer screening will increase cancer in the overall population from pre-COVID-19 trajectories, and elevate the cancer disparity in minority populations. Knowing the overall benefit of cancer screening versus the risk of acquiring COVID-19, utilizing at-home screening tests and keeping the COVID-19-induced delay in screening to a minimum might slow the growth of disparity.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesPandemicsPneumonia, ViralBetacoronavirusCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32943438
PMCPMC8212395
OpenAlexW3087424668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.