Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943430›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2020

Improving knowledge translation for increased engagement and impact in healthcare.

Kathy Eljiz, David Greenfield, Anne Hogden, Robyn Taylor, Nazlee Siddiqui, Maria Agaliotis, Marianna Milosavljevic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05702008 (Social Media as an Information, Education and Communication Tool for Rabies Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05702008 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Social Media as an Information, Education and Communication Tool for Rabies Prevention: An Interventional Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaulana Azad Medical CollegeRan2022 to 2022Enrolled300ConditionsRabies, Health Education, Public Health, Preventive Health ServicesArmsRabies Information Education and Communication Material
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathy EljizAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Kathy.Eljiz@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0970-1888
David GreenfieldAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anne HogdenAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robyn TaylorAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nazlee SiddiquiAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-3095
Maria AgaliotisAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3691-2234
Marianna MilosavljevicResearch Operations, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare · AUIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ineffective knowledge dissemination contributes to clinical practice and service improvements not being realised. Meaningful knowledge translation can occur through the understanding and matching of appropriate communication mediums that are relevant for different stakeholders or audiences. To this end, we present a dissemination instrument, the 'REAch and Diffusion of health iMprovement Evidence' (README) checklist, for the communication of research findings, integrating both traditional and newer communication mediums. Additionally, we propose a 'Strategic Translation and Engagement Planning' (STEP) tool, for use when deciding which mediums to select. The STEP tool challenges the need for communicating complex and simple information against the desire for passive or active stakeholder interaction. Used collaboratively by academics and health professionals, README and STEP can promote co-production of research, subsequent diffusion of knowledge, and develop the capacity and skills of all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHumansInformation DisseminationPatient ParticipationTranslational Research, Biomedicalcommunicationhealth services researchimplementation science

Identifiers

PMID32943430
PMCPMC7500202
OpenAlexW3087122911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.