Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943333›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2021

Deep Learning for Automated Liver Segmentation to Aid in the Study of Infectious Diseases in Nonhuman Primates.

Syed M S Reza, Dara Bradley, Nina Aiosa, Marcelo Castro, Ji Hyun Lee, Byeong-Yeul Lee, Richard S Bennett, Lisa E Hensley, Yu Cong, Reed Johnson and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Machine Learning in Nonhuman Primate Models of Infectious Diseases: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Review
  2. [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence and Infectious Disease Imaging.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Syed M S RezaCenter for Infectious Disease Imaging, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Dara BradleyCenter for Infectious Disease Imaging, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Nina AiosaCenter for Infectious Disease Imaging, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Marcelo CastroIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Ji Hyun LeeIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Byeong-Yeul LeeIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Richard S BennettIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Lisa E HensleyIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Yu CongIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Reed JohnsonIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Dima HammoudCenter for Infectious Disease Imaging, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Irwin FeuersteinIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Jeffrey SolomonIntegrated Research Facility, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA; Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Frederick, MD, 21702, USA. Electronic address: Jeffrey.solomon@nih.gov.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200700016INIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201800013C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of deep learning, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have evolved as an effective method for the automated segmentation of different tissues in medical image analysis. In certain infectious diseases, the liver is one of the more highly affected organs, where an accurate liver segmentation method may play a significant role to improve the diagnosis, quantification, and follow-up. Although several segmentation algorithms have been proposed for liver or liver-tumor segmentation in computed tomography (CT) of human subjects, none of them have been investigated for nonhuman primates (NHPs), where the livers have a wide range in size and morphology. In addition, the unique characteristics of different infections or the heterogeneous immune responses of different NHPs to the infections appear with a diverse radiodensity distribution in the CT imaging. In this study, we investigated three state-of-the-art algorithms; VNet, UNet, and feature pyramid network (FPN) for automated liver segmentation in whole-body CT images of NHPs. The efficacy of the CNNs were evaluated on 82 scans of 37 animals, including pre and post-exposure to different viruses such as Ebola, Marburg, and Lassa. Using a 10-fold cross-validation, the best performance for the segmented liver was provided by the FPN; an average 94.77% Dice score, and 3.6% relative absolute volume difference. Our study demonstrated the efficacy of multiple CNNs, wherein the FPN outperforms VNet and UNet for liver segmentation in infectious disease imaging research.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesDeep LearningAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverPrimatesCTdeep learninginfectious diseaselivernonhuman primatesegmentationwhole-body

Identifiers

PMID32943333
PMCPMC7956023
OpenAlexW3085570923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.