ReviewPsychosomatics
Coronavirus and Its Implications for Psychiatry: A Rapid Review of the Early Literature.
Review in Psychosomatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Remote mental health care interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review.Behaviour research and therapy · 2022Pooled it
- The Early Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health Facilities and Psychiatric Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Editorial: Integrated cardiovascular and neural system processes as potential mechanisms of behavior change.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Psychological impacts of the COVID-19 on health care providers.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- [COVID-19 and telepsychiatry: a challenge for mental health management].Revista colombiana de psiquiatria · 2022Review
- Lessons Learned from the Covid-19 Crisis: Recommendations for Action to Optimize Occupational Health in Mental Health Professionals in Europe.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2022Article
- Liaison psychiatry before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.Psychiatry research · 2022Article
- Opportunities and Challenges for Professionals in Psychiatry and Mental Health Care Using Digital Technologies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.JMIR human factors · 2022Review
- Increased Autonomic Reactivity and Mental Health Difficulties in COVID-19 Survivors: Implications for Medical Providers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- A review on the COVID-19-related psychological impact on older adults: vulnerable or not?Aging clinical and experimental research · 2021Review
- Wellbeing and clinical videoconferencing satisfaction among patients in psychotrauma treatment during the coronavirus pandemic: cross-sectional study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2021Article
- Older people at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.Journal of health monitoring · 2021Article
- Videoconferencing-Based Telemental Health: Important Questions for the COVID-19 Era From Clinical and Patient-Centered Perspectives.JMIR mental health · 2020Article
- The Role of Psychiatry in Treating Burnout Among Nurses During the Covid-19 Pandemic.Journal of radiology nursing · 2020Review
- Report of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Task Force on Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Executive Summary.Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison PsychiatryReview
- Long COVID and Its Psychiatric Aspects.Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison PsychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus pandemic has changed health care rapidly and dramatically.
objectiveTo provide a critical synthesis of the scientific literature on the pandemic's implications for psychiatric practice.
methodsA rapid literature review was undertaken to identify scientific literature linking psychiatric outcomes and practice changes due to coronavirus and the disease it causes (COVID-19). A structured quality assessment was used to assess those articles reporting quantitative data.
resultsFifty articles were identified for inclusion, but only 12 contained original data. Eleven of those twelve were rated as of weak quality. The literature described psychiatric sequelae of the coronavirus and related public health interventions through cross-sectional surveys among different populations; no studies include diagnostic or functional impairment data. Populations at risk include COVID-19 survivors, health care workers, the elderly, and those with preexisting psychiatric disease. Impacts on psychiatric practice were described, again without data on changes to quality or access of care.
conclusionsThere is a quickly accumulating body of evidence on the psychiatric implications of coronavirus including psychological effects on the general public and at-risk subgroups. Similarly, psychiatric practice has witnessed substantial adaptation to the pandemic. However, there remain significant gaps in scientific knowledge. We suggest opportunities for consultation-liaison psychiatry to improve the understanding of the relationship between coronavirus and psychiatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.