Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943203›Full record

ArticleSurgery2020

Impact of visitor restriction rules on the postoperative experience of COVID-19 negative patients undergoing surgery.

Ryan D Zeh, Heena P Santry, Christina Monsour, Alan A Sumski, John F P Bridges, Allan Tsung, Timothy M Pawlik, Jordan M Cloyd

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. "Like not having an arm": a qualitative study of the impact of visitor restrictions on cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan D ZehDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Heena P SantryDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Christina MonsourDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Alan A SumskiDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
John F P BridgesDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Allan TsungDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Jordan M CloydDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: jordan.cloyd@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany hospitals have implemented visitor restriction policies in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Because caregivers serve an important role in postoperative recovery, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of visitor restrictions on the postoperative experience of coronavirus disease 2019-negative patients undergoing surgery.

methodsPatients who underwent surgery immediately before or after the implementation of a visitor restriction policy were enrolled. Patients were surveyed on their inpatient experience and preparedness for discharge using items adapted from validated questionnaires.

resultsAmong 128 eligible patients, 117 agreed to participate (91.4% response rate): 58 (49.6%) in the Visitor Cohort and 59 (50.4%) in the No-Visitor Cohort. Mean age was 57.5 years (standard deviation 13.9) and 66 (56.4%) were female. Among all patients, 47.8% underwent oncologic surgery, 31.6% transplant, and 20.5% general or other. Patients in the No-Visitor Cohort were less likely to report complete satisfaction with the hospital experience (80.7% vs 66.0%, P = .044), timely receipt of medications (84.5% vs 69.0%, P = .048), and assistance getting out of bed (70.7% vs 51.7%, P = .036). No-Visitor Cohort patients were less likely to feel that their discharge preferences were adequately considered (79.3% vs 54.2%, P = .004). Qualitative analysis of patient responses highlighted the consistent psychosocial support provided by visitors after surgery (84.5%), and patients in the No-Visitor Cohort reported social isolation due to lack of psychosocial support (50.8%).

conclusionThe implementation of hospital visitor restriction policies may adversely impact the postoperative experience of coronavirus disease 2019-negative patients undergoing surgery. These findings highlight the urgent need for novel patient-centered strategies to improve the postoperative experience of patients during ongoing or future disruptions to routine hospital practice.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusPandemicsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross InfectionFemaleHospitalsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOhioPatient DischargePneumonia, ViralPostoperative PeriodSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32943203
PMCPMC7437486
OpenAlexW3049220741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.