Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943128›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2021

Increasing dietary fibre intake in healthy adults using personalised dietary advice compared with general advice: a single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Iris Rijnaarts, Nicole M de Roos, Taojun Wang, Erwin G Zoetendal, Jan Top, Marielle Timmer, Emily P Bouwman, Koen Hogenelst, Ben Witteman, Nicole de Wit

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06212817 (FiberUP in Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06212817 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

FiberUP in Clinical Practice: Increasing Preoperative Dietary Fiber Intake in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorWageningen UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled54ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsDietary intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Development and validation of the FiberScreen: A short questionnaire to screen fibre intake in adults.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Iris RijnaartsDivision of Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7811-6669
Nicole M de RoosDivision of Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Taojun WangLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Erwin G ZoetendalLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jan TopWageningen Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marielle TimmerWageningen Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Emily P BouwmanWageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Koen HogenelstDepartment of Training and Performance Innovations, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Soesterberg, the Netherlands.
Ben WittemanDivision of Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Nicole de WitWageningen Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA high-fibre diet is associated with a lower risk for diseases. However, few adults meet the dietary fibre recommendation. Therefore, the effects and acceptance of an algorithm-generated personalised dietary advice (PDA) compared with general advice (GA) on fibre intake were investigated.

designA 6-week, single-blind randomised controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up.

settingPDA was based on habitual intake and provided fibre-rich alternatives using a website; GA contained brochures. Dietary intake was assessed at baseline, week 1, week 6 and 3-month follow-up. Both groups evaluated their advice at week 6. All participants had access to PDA from week 7 until 3-month follow-up.

participantsTwo groups of healthy adults: PDA (n 34) and GA (n 47). For 3-month follow-up analysis, participants were re-divided into visitors (n 52) and non-visitors (n 26) of the PDA.

resultsAt week 6, energy intake remained stable in both groups, but fibre intake per 1000 kcal increased non-significantly in both groups (PDA = Δ0·5 ± 2·8; GA = Δ0·8 ± 3·1, P = 0·128). Importantly, a significantly higher percentage of PDA participants adhered to the recommendation compared with week 1 (PDA = 21 % increase; GA = 4 % increase, P ≤ 0·001). PDA participants evaluated the advice significantly better compared with GA participants. At 3-month follow-up, fibre intake increased compared with baseline (visitors = Δ2·2 ± 2·6, P < 0·001; non-visitors = Δ1·5 ± 1·9, P = 0·001), but was insignificantly different between groups. Visitors had a decrease and non-visitors had an increase in energy intake (visitors =Δ - 132 ± 525; non-visitors = Δ109 ± 507, P = 0·055).

conclusionsThe algorithm-generated PDA was well accepted and stimulated adherence to the recommendations more than GA, indicating to be a suitable and cost-efficient method for improving dietary fibre intake in healthy adults.

Indexed as

Dietary FiberEnergy IntakeAdultCounselingHealth EducationHumansSingle-Blind MethodDietary FiberAdviceDietary fibreEvaluationPersonalisedTailored

Identifiers

PMID32943128
PMCPMC8025104
OpenAlexW3087648047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.