Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943086›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

Removing reference bias and improving indel calling in ancient DNA data analysis by mapping to a sequence variation graph.

Rui Martiniano, Erik Garrison, Eppie R Jones, Andrea Manica, Richard Durbin

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pangenome-aware DeepVariant.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui MartinianoDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0DH, UK.
Erik GarrisonWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Eppie R JonesDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK.
Andrea ManicaDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK.
Richard DurbinDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0DH, UK. richard.durbin@gen.cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207492/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT206194Wellcome Trust WT207492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the last decade, the analysis of ancient DNA (aDNA) sequence has become a powerful tool for the study of past human populations. However, the degraded nature of aDNA means that aDNA molecules are short and frequently mutated by post-mortem chemical modifications. These features decrease read mapping accuracy and increase reference bias, in which reads containing non-reference alleles are less likely to be mapped than those containing reference alleles. Alternative approaches have been developed to replace the linear reference with a variation graph which includes known alternative variants at each genetic locus. Here, we evaluate the use of variation graph software vg to avoid reference bias for aDNA and compare with existing methods.

resultsWe use vg to align simulated and real aDNA samples to a variation graph containing 1000 Genome Project variants and compare with the same data aligned with bwa to the human linear reference genome. Using vg leads to a balanced allelic representation at polymorphic sites, effectively removing reference bias, and more sensitive variant detection in comparison with bwa, especially for insertions and deletions (indels). Alternative approaches that use relaxed bwa parameter settings or filter bwa alignments can also reduce bias but can have lower sensitivity than vg, particularly for indels.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that aligning aDNA sequences to variation graphs effectively mitigates the impact of reference bias when analyzing aDNA, while retaining mapping sensitivity and allowing detection of variation, in particular indel variation, that was previously missed.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanINDEL MutationDNA, AncientHumansReference StandardsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, AncientAncient DNAReference biasSequence alignmentVariation graph

Identifiers

PMID32943086
PMCPMC7499850
OpenAlexW3086246013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.