Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943066›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2020

Uptake of HIV testing among adolescents and associated adolescent-friendly services.

Rachel Kidman, Jennifer Waidler, Tia Palermo, Tanzania Adolescent Cash Plus Evaluation Team

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. "Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel KidmanDepartment of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, HSC Level 3, Room 79 Stony Brook University (State University of New York), Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Jennifer WaidlerUNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti, Via degli Alfani 58, 50121, Florence, Italy. jwaidler@unicef.org.
Tia PalermoDepartment of Epidemiology at Environmental Health, 270 Farber Hall, University at Buffalo (State University of New York), Buffalo, NY, 14214-8001, USA.
Tanzania Adolescent Cash Plus Evaluation Team
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USState University of New York · USUnited Nations Children's Fund · US

Funding

Department for International Development 203529-102Oak Foundation OCAY-16-73Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete (SE) G41102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV testing remains low among adolescents. Making public health services more adolescent-friendly is one strategy used to encourage testing. However, it remains unclear whether government-led initiatives have a meaningfully impact.

methodsThe current study is observational and utilizes two sources of data (health-facility and adolescent-level) from one round of data collection of an on-going, longitudinal impact evaluation of a pilot cash plus program targeting adolescents. This study linked data from adolescent surveys (n = 2191) to data collected from nearby government-run health facilities (n = 91) in two rural regions of Tanzania. We used log binomial regression models to estimate the association between specific adolescent-friendly health service (AFHS) characteristics and adolescents' uptake of 1) HIV testing and 2) visiting a health care facility in the past year for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services.

resultsMost adolescents (67%) lived in a village with a health facility, and all offered HIV services. We find, however, that AFHS have not been fully implemented. For example, less than 40% of facilities reported that they had guidelines for adolescent care. Only 12% of facilities had a system in place for referral and follow-up with adolescent clients, yet this was an important predictor of both past-year HIV testing (RR = 1.28, p < 0.1) and SRH visits (RR = 1.44, p < 0.05). Less than half (44%) offered services for survivors of gender-based violence (GBV), a significant predictor of past-year HIV testing (RR = 1.20, p < 0.05) and SRH visits (RR = 1.41, p < 0.01) among sexually-active adolescents.

conclusionsWe find that national guidelines on AFHS have not been fully translated into practice at the local level. We highlight particular gaps in adolescent referral systems and GBV services. Scaling up these two essential services could encourage greater HIV testing among a high-risk population, in addition to providing much needed support for survivors of violence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHIV TestingHumansMaleReproductive Health ServicesRural PopulationSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaYoung AdultAdolescent-friendly servicesAdolescentsHIV testingSRHTanzania

Identifiers

PMID32943066
PMCPMC7499858
OpenAlexW3087618933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.