ArticleGlobalization and health2020
HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships.
Article in Globalization and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Challenges in Elucidating HIV-1 Genetic Diversity in the Middle East and North Africa: A Review Based on a Systematic Search.Viruses · 2025Pooled it
- Multinational appraisal of the epidemiological distribution of opioid fatalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-synthesis and science mapping analysis of HIV/HPV co-infection: a global perspective with emphasis on Africa.Globalization and health · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions for HIV Prevention and Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.AIDS and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Can a sovereign health research culture bolster Africa's involvement in global health?Global health action · 2026Article
- International collaborative research and development (R&D) on traditional medicine and its contextual factors: a cross-sectional analysis from 1996 to 2022.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Article
- Diversity and inclusion in chronic hepatitis B randomised controlled trials: A systematic meta-epidemiological review.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- Facilitators and barriers for healthcare workers' adherence to the national nutritional guidelines for people living with HIV in Dar-es-Salaam: A mixed-method study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers, changing paradigms: Africa's radical agenda for HIV sustainability.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
- Exploring healthcare workers' perceptions of child health research at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Malawi: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.Human resources for health · 2024Article
- A framework for sustainable capacity-building for collaborative North-South translational health research and training in a resource-constrained setting.Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- Global research on cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Equity in HIV mental health research: a call to action.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- "We should be at the table together from the beginning": perspectives on partnership from stakeholders at four research institutions in sub-Saharan Africa.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- What makes working together work? A scoping review of the guidance on North-South research partnerships.Health policy and planning · 2022Article
- Understanding Individual Barriers to HIV Testing Among Undergraduate University Students: Results From a Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- One hundred years of zoonoses research in the Horn of Africa: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Research productivity and collaboration of the NIH-funded HIV vaccine trials network: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHIV/AIDS has attracted considerable research attention since the 1980s. In the current context of globalization and the predominance of cooperative work, it is crucial to analyze the participation of the countries and regions where the infection is most prevalent. This study assesses the participation of African countries in publications on the topic, as well as the degree of equity or influence existing in North-South relations.
methodsWe identified all articles and reviews of HIV/AIDS indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. We analyzed the scientific production, collaboration, and contributions from African and Middle Eastern countries to scientific activity in the region. The concept of leadership, measured through the participation as the first author of documents in collaboration was used to determine the equity in research produced through international collaboration.
resultsA total of 68,808 documents published from 2010 to 2017 were analyzed. Researchers from North America and Europe participated in 82.14% of the global scientific production on HIV/AIDS, compared to just 21.61% from Africa and the Middle East. Furthermore, the publications that did come out of these regions was concentrated in a small number of countries, led by South Africa (41% of the documents). Other features associated with HIV/AIDS publications from Africa include the importance of international collaboration from the USA, the UK, and other European countries (75-93% of the documents) and the limited participation as first authors that is evident (30 to 36% of the documents). Finally, the publications to which African countries contributed had a notably different disciplinary orientation, with a predominance of research on public health, epidemiology, and drug therapy.
conclusionsIt is essential to foster more balance in research output, avoid the concentration of resources that reproduces the global North-South model on the African continent, and focus the research agenda on local priorities. To accomplish this, the global North should strengthen the transfer of research skills and seek equity in cooperative ties, favoring the empowerment of African countries. These efforts should be concentrated in countries with low scientific activity and high incidence and prevalence of the disease. It is also essential to foster intraregional collaborations between African countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.