SynthesisRespiratory research2020
Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials.
Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 11 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Efficacy and Safety Comparison of One-Year Treatment of Two Doses (5mg and 10mg) of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution Delivered by the Respimat Device in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Efficacy and Safety Comparison of One-Year Treatment of Two Doses (5mg and 10mg) of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution Delivered by the Respimat Device in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Efficacy {FEV1, COPD Exacerbations & HRQoL} & Safety of 5mcg Tiotropium Respimat in COPD
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 mcg [2 Actuations of 2.5 mcg] and 10 mcg [2 Actuations of 5 mcg]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 mcg [2 Actuations of 2.5 mcg] and 10 mcg [2 Actuations of 5 mcg]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD
A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 µg [2 Actuations of 2.5 ug] and 10 ug [2 Actuations of 5 ug]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, and 48 Weeks of Twice Daily Foradil® (12 µg) Delivered by the Aerolizer® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 µg [2 Actuations of 2.5 ug] and 10 ug [2 Actuations of 5 ug]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, and 48 Weeks of Twice Daily Foradil® (12 µg) Delivered by the Aerolizer® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Impact of Stepwise Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on Optimized Bronchodilator Therapy
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). [TOnado TM 1]
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [TOnado TM 2]
A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effect of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination Compared With Tiotropium on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation in Patients With Severe to Very Severe COPD. [DYNAGITO]
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Predictors of Acute Exacerbations in COPD: A Systematic Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- High blood eosinophils predict the risk of COPD exacerbation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- COPD Biologics: Right Patient, Right Pathway, Right Time.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Exploratory Identification of Multidimensional COPD Clusters Using Unsupervised Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- A 3-year prospective study to assess clinical characteristics and risk factors for exacerbations in patients with asthma-COPD overlap based on the GINA guideline compared with patients with asthma and COPD.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Persistently low blood eosinophils identify a high-risk phenotype in COPD.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Is blood eosinophilia a treatable trait in chronic obstructive airway diseases?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Reducing Asthma and COPD Exacerbations in Patients with Severe Asthma and Concomitant COPD: Real-World Evidence from the ZEPHYR-5 Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Nonlinear association between blood eosinophil counts and clinical outcomes in ICU-Admitted patients with acute exacerbation of COPD: a retrospective observational study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Observational
- Diagnosing Type 2 Inflammation in COPD: Comparison of Blood and Sputum Eosinophil Assessment in the University of California Los Angeles COPD Phenotyping Study.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Cell viability measured by cytotoxicity assay as a biomarker of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Drug evaluation: mepolizumab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Immunotherapy · 2025Review
- Impact of Triple Inhaler Therapy on COPD Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Radical Surgery: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Airway microbial and metabolic features associated with ICS therapy in COPD.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Endotypes of Paediatric Cough-Do They Exist and Finding New Techniques to Improve Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Predictive Role of White Blood Cell Differential Count for the Development of Acute Exacerbation in Korean Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Observational
- Blood eosinophils levels in a Colombian cohort of biomass-and tobacco-related COPD patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Long-Term Outcome of Childhood Asthma: Characterizing COPD-A and COPD-C Subtypes in Adulthood.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
- Blood eosinophils in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A potential biomarker.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive airflow limitation and chronic inflammation. Predicting exacerbations of COPD, which contribute to disease progression, is important to guide preventative treatment and improve outcomes. Blood eosinophils are a biomarker for patient responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); however, their effectiveness as a predictive biomarker for COPD exacerbations is unclear.
methodsThis post hoc analysis pooled data from 11 Boehringer Ingelheim-sponsored Phase III and IV randomised COPD studies with similar methodologies. Exacerbation data were collected from these studies, excluding patients from the ICS withdrawal arm of the WISDOM® study. Patients were grouped according to their baseline blood eosinophil count, baseline ICS use and number of exacerbations in the year prior to each study.
resultsExacerbation rate data and baseline eosinophil count were available for 22,125 patients; 45.6% presented with a baseline blood eosinophil count of ≤ 150 cells/μL, 34.3% with 150-300 cells/μL and 20.1% with > 300 cells/μL. The lowest exacerbation rates were observed in patients with ≤ 150 cells/μL, with small increases in exacerbation rate observed with increasing eosinophil count. When stratified by exacerbation history, the annual rate of exacerbations for patients with 0 exacerbations in the previous year increased in line with increasing eosinophil counts (0.38 for ≤ 150 cells/μL, 0.39 for 150-300 cells/μL and 0.44 for > 300 cells/μL respectively). A similar trend was identified for patients with one exacerbation in the previous year, 0.62, 0.66 and 0.67 respectively. For patients with ≥ 2 exacerbations, exacerbation rates fluctuated between 1.02 (≤ 150 cells/μL) to 1.10 (150-300 cells/μL) and 1.07 (> 300 cells/μL). Higher exacerbation rates were noted in patients treated with ICS at baseline (range 0.75 to 0.82 with increasing eosinophil count) compared with patients not on ICS (range 0.45 to 0.49).
conclusionWe found no clinically important relationship between baseline blood eosinophil count and exacerbation rate. Hence, the current analysis does not support the use of blood eosinophils to predict exacerbation risk; however, previous exacerbation history was found to be a more reliable predictor of future exacerbations.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00168844 , NCT00168831 , NCT00387088 , NCT00782210 , NCT00782509 , NCT00793624 , NCT00796653 , NCT01431274 , NCT01431287 , NCT02296138 and NCT00975195 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.