Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943047›Full record

SynthesisRespiratory research2020

Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials.

Dave Singh, Jadwiga A Wedzicha, Salman Siddiqui, Alberto de la Hoz, Wenqiong Xue, Helgo Magnussen, Marc Miravitlles, James D Chalmers, Peter M A Calverley

11 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 11 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00168831 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Efficacy and Safety Comparison of One-Year Treatment of Two Doses (5mg and 10mg) of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution Delivered by the Respimat Device in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2003Enrolled1,007ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsTiotropium Inhalation Solution, Placebo
NCT00168844 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Efficacy and Safety Comparison of One-Year Treatment of Two Doses (5mg and 10mg) of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution Delivered by the Respimat Device in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2003Enrolled983ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsTiotropium Inhalation Solution, Placebo
NCT00387088 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy {FEV1, COPD Exacerbations & HRQoL} & Safety of 5mcg Tiotropium Respimat in COPD

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2006Enrolled3,991ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsRespimat, Tiotropium
NCT00782210 phase3completednot on this map

Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 mcg [2 Actuations of 2.5 mcg] and 10 mcg [2 Actuations of 5 mcg]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2008Enrolled625ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsOlodaterol (BI1744), placebo
NCT00782509 phase3completednot on this map

Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 mcg [2 Actuations of 2.5 mcg] and 10 mcg [2 Actuations of 5 mcg]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2009Enrolled644ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsOlodaterol (BI 1744), Placebo
NCT00793624 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 µg [2 Actuations of 2.5 ug] and 10 ug [2 Actuations of 5 ug]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, and 48 Weeks of Twice Daily Foradil® (12 µg) Delivered by the Aerolizer® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2009Enrolled906ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsOlodaterol (BI 1744), Formoterol, Placebo
NCT00796653 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 48 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled BI 1744 CL (5 µg [2 Actuations of 2.5 ug] and 10 ug [2 Actuations of 5 ug]) Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler, and 48 Weeks of Twice Daily Foradil® (12 µg) Delivered by the Aerolizer® Inhaler, in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2009Enrolled937ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsOlodaterol (BI 1744), Formoterol, Placebo
NCT00975195 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Impact of Stepwise Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on Optimized Bronchodilator Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2009 to 2013Enrolled2,488ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmstiotropium inhalation, salmeterol xinafoate, fluticasone propionate, placebo matched for fluticasone propionate
NCT01431274 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). [TOnado TM 1]

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2011 to 2013Enrolled2,624ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmstiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium, olodaterol, Respimat
NCT01431287 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [TOnado TM 2]

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2011 to 2013Enrolled2,539ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmstiotropium + olodaterol, tiotropium, olodaterol, Respimat
NCT02296138 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effect of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination Compared With Tiotropium on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation in Patients With Severe to Very Severe COPD. [DYNAGITO]

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2015 to 2017Enrolled7,903ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsolodaterol, tiotropium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictors of Acute Exacerbations in COPD: A Systematic Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Dave SinghMedicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. DSingh@meu.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8918-7075
Jadwiga A WedzichaRespiratory Division, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Salman SiddiquiNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre: Respiratory Theme, and Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Alberto de la HozBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Wenqiong XueBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Helgo MagnussenPulmonary Research Institute at Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron/Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain.
James D ChalmersScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Peter M A CalverleyClinical Science Centre, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESImperial College London · GBLungenClinic Grosshansdorf · DEManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim N/AMedical Research Council G0800570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive airflow limitation and chronic inflammation. Predicting exacerbations of COPD, which contribute to disease progression, is important to guide preventative treatment and improve outcomes. Blood eosinophils are a biomarker for patient responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); however, their effectiveness as a predictive biomarker for COPD exacerbations is unclear.

methodsThis post hoc analysis pooled data from 11 Boehringer Ingelheim-sponsored Phase III and IV randomised COPD studies with similar methodologies. Exacerbation data were collected from these studies, excluding patients from the ICS withdrawal arm of the WISDOM® study. Patients were grouped according to their baseline blood eosinophil count, baseline ICS use and number of exacerbations in the year prior to each study.

resultsExacerbation rate data and baseline eosinophil count were available for 22,125 patients; 45.6% presented with a baseline blood eosinophil count of ≤ 150 cells/μL, 34.3% with 150-300 cells/μL and 20.1% with > 300 cells/μL. The lowest exacerbation rates were observed in patients with ≤ 150 cells/μL, with small increases in exacerbation rate observed with increasing eosinophil count. When stratified by exacerbation history, the annual rate of exacerbations for patients with 0 exacerbations in the previous year increased in line with increasing eosinophil counts (0.38 for ≤ 150 cells/μL, 0.39 for 150-300 cells/μL and 0.44 for > 300 cells/μL respectively). A similar trend was identified for patients with one exacerbation in the previous year, 0.62, 0.66 and 0.67 respectively. For patients with ≥ 2 exacerbations, exacerbation rates fluctuated between 1.02 (≤ 150 cells/μL) to 1.10 (150-300 cells/μL) and 1.07 (> 300 cells/μL). Higher exacerbation rates were noted in patients treated with ICS at baseline (range 0.75 to 0.82 with increasing eosinophil count) compared with patients not on ICS (range 0.45 to 0.49).

conclusionWe found no clinically important relationship between baseline blood eosinophil count and exacerbation rate. Hence, the current analysis does not support the use of blood eosinophils to predict exacerbation risk; however, previous exacerbation history was found to be a more reliable predictor of future exacerbations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00168844 , NCT00168831 , NCT00387088 , NCT00782210 , NCT00782509 , NCT00793624 , NCT00796653 , NCT01431274 , NCT01431287 , NCT02296138 and NCT00975195 .

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicEosinophilsForecastingHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk FactorsBiomarkersClinically irrelevantEosinophilsExacerbationsICSPooledRandomized controlled trialsRate ratio

Identifiers

PMID32943047
PMCPMC7499955
OpenAlexW3087754885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 5 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.