Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32943025›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy.

Xue Liang, Xiang Jing

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Approach to gallbladder polyps in pediatric patients.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xue LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Artificial Cell, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center of Public Health Ministry, No. 83, Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China.
Xiang JingDepartment of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Artificial Cell, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center of Public Health Ministry, No. 83, Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China. xiangjing056@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2977-1410
Tianjin Third Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder lesions is sometimes difficult. The objective of this study is to assess whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can be an accurate method for detecting gallbladder malignancy and to determine which imaging signs can be indicative of malignancy.

methodsA study search of PubMed, Elsevier, and Sciencedirect was performed in May 2019. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were used to examine the accuracy of CEUS and CH-EUS.

resultsTwenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of CEUS and CH-EUS were 0.81 (0.75-0.86) and 0.92 (0.86-0.95); the specificities were 0.94 (0.90-0.96) and 0.89 (0.69-0. 97); the DORs were 64 (32-127) and 89 (22-354); and the area under the SROC curves were 0.90 (0.87-0.92) and 0.92 (0.90-0.94). On CEUS, the diagnostic criterion for gallbladder malignancy according to four features were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (0.65-0.83) and 0.98 (0.85-1.00) for integrity of gallbladder wall; 0.69 (0.55-0.81) and 0.89 (0.77-0.95) for heterogeneous enhancement; 0.81 (0.71-0.88) and 0.88 (0.76-0.94) for irregular vessels; and 0.81 (0.66-0.91) and 0.75 (0.59-0.86) for washout time within 28 s. On CH-EUS, heterogeneous enhancement could be indicative of malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 0.94 (0.85-0.97); and the specificity was 0.92 (0.71-0.98).

conclusionsCEUS and CH-EUS are promising and reliable imaging modalities with a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy. CH-EUS might be more sensitive than CEUS with a higher sensitivity. In addition, irregular tralesional vessels and washout time within 28 s on CEUS and heterogeneous enhancement on CH-EUS are indicative of malignancy. However, larger scale and well-designed studies are warranted to verify our results.

Indexed as

EndosonographyGallbladder NeoplasmsAgedContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaContrast-enhanced ultrasoundDiagnosisEndoscopic ultrasonographyGallbladderMalignant lesionsMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID32943025
PMCPMC7499977
OpenAlexW3084466644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.