Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32942960›Full record

ArticleTopics in stroke rehabilitation2021

Verbal feedback enhances motor learning during post-stroke gait retraining.

Nicole K Rendos, Laura Zajac-Cox, Rahul Thomas, Sumire Sato, Steven Eicholtz, Trisha M Kesar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhancing the learning of sports skills through verbal feedback.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole K RendosDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-5498
Laura Zajac-CoxDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rahul ThomasDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sumire SatoNeuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Steven EicholtzDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Trisha M KesarDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Biomechanical and neural mechanisms of post-stroke gait trainingR01HD095975 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KESAR, TRISHA · 2019 to 2024
$2.9M
Cortical and spinal correlates of stroke gait rehabilitationK01HD079584 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KESAR, TRISHA · 2014 to 2018
$632k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 13SDG13320000NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD079584NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFast treadmill walking combined with functional electrical stimulation to ankle muscles (FastFES) is a well-studied gait intervention that improves post-stroke walking function. Although individualized verbal feedback is commonly incorporated during clinical gait training, and a variable practice structure is posited to enhance learning, the influence of these two factors on motor learning during locomotor interventions such as FastFES is poorly understood.

objectivesTo determine if the addition of individualized verbal feedback or variable practice to a FastFES training session enhances motor learning of targeted gait patterns.

methodsNine individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis completed a crossover study comprising exposure to 3 dose-matched types of gait training: (1) FastFES (FF), comprising five 6-minute bouts of training with intermittent FES, (2) FF with addition of individualized verbal instructions and faded feedback delivered by a physical therapist (FF+PT), (3) FF with variable gait speed and FES timing (FF+Var). Gait biomechanics data were collected before (Pre), immediately after (Post), and 24-h following (Retention) each training type. Within-session and retention change scores of 3 targeted gait variables were calculated to assess locomotor learning.

resultsFF+PT resulted in larger improvements within-session and at retention in trailing limb angle, and a trend for larger improvements in paretic pushoff compared to FF. FF+Var failed to show greater learning of biomechanical variables compared to FF.

conclusionsAddition of individualized verbal feedback (FF+PT) to a single session of gait training may enhance within- and across-session learning of targeted gait variables in people post-stroke, and merits more investigation.

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicStrokeStroke RehabilitationBiomechanical PhenomenaCross-Over StudiesFeedbackGaitHumansWalkingcerebrovascular accidentgait propulsionrehabilitationvariable practiceVerbal instructionswalking

Identifiers

PMID32942960
PMCPMC7969478
OpenAlexW3087737351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.