Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32942125›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2020

Dynamic pulvino-cortical interactions in the primate attention network.

Sabine Kastner, Ian C Fiebelkorn, Manoj K Eradath

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Associative Thalamus: A Switchboard for Cortical Operations and a Promising Target for Schizophrenia.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Cellular and laminar architecture: A short history and commentary.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Attention control in the primate brain.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabine KastnerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, United States. Electronic address: skastner@princeton.edu.
Ian C FiebelkornPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, United States.
Manoj K EradathPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, United States.
Princeton University · US

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI STEPHANIE Ruggiano JONES · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Functions of the Thalamus in Perception and CognitionR01EY017699 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SABINE KASTNER · 2007 to 2026
$6.4M
Neural mechanisms of attentionR01MH064043 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KASTNER, SABINE, KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017699NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While research in previous decades demonstrated a link between the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus and visual selective attention, the pulvinar's specific functional role has remained elusive. However, methodological advances in electrophysiological recordings in non-human primates, including simultaneous recordings in multiple brain regions, have recently begun to reveal the pulvinar's functional contributions to selective attention. These new findings suggest that the pulvinar is critical for the efficient transmission of sensory information within and between cortical regions, both synchronizing cortical activity across brain regions and controlling cortical excitability. These new findings further suggest that the pulvinar's influence on cortical processing is embedded in a dynamic selection process that balances sensory and motor functions within the large-scale network that directs selective attention.

Indexed as

PulvinarAnimalsPrimatesThalamus

Identifiers

PMID32942125
PMCPMC7770054
OpenAlexW3086845931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.