Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32941781›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2021

Development of a model of soft tissue simulation using ballistic gelatin for CBCT acquisitions related to dentomaxillofacial radiology research.

Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele, Priscila de Azeredo Lopes, Gustavo Machado Santaella, Karla Faria Vasconcelos, Deborah Queiroz de Freitas, Anne Caroline Oenning, Francisco Carlos Groppo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eduarda Helena Leandro NascimentoDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Rocharles Cavalcante FonteneleDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Priscila de Azeredo LopesOdontoclínica Central da Marinha, Serviço de radiologia e Imaginologia Odontológica, Brazilian Navy, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Gustavo Machado SantaellaRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Department of Diagnosis and Oral Health, University of Louisville, Lousville, KY, USA.
Karla Faria VasconcelosOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Deborah Queiroz de FreitasDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Anne Caroline OenningDivision of Oral Radiology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco Carlos GroppoDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo present the ballistic gelatin as a new material capable of simulating the soft tissues in cone-beam CT (CBCT) images.

methodsCBCT images of three piglet heads were acquired with their soft tissues intact (standard group). Subsequently, the piglet heads were fixed in a container using metallic pins and moulded with acrylic resin; the soft tissues were then removed and replaced by ballistic gelatin, with the same thickness of the original soft tissues. The images were evaluated by two oral radiologists, to check the adaptation on bone surfaces, thickness and density, penetration into large bone cavities and cancellous bone, and the presence of air bubbles using a 5-score scale. Additionally, an objective analysis was carried out by one oral radiologist. For each CBCT scan, three axial reconstructions were selected to represent the mandibular, occlusal, and maxillary levels. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the grey values were calculated in four regions of interest determined on soft tissue areas and compared by two-way ANOVA.

resultsThe ballistic gelatin showed subjective scores ranging from good to excellent for all parameters evaluated. There was no significant difference in the mean and SD values of the grey values between ballistic gelatin and the gold standard groups for all levels (

conclusionsBallistic gelatin has visual and objective similarity with the gold standard. Thus, the ballistic gelatin is a promising material capable of simulating soft tissues in CBCT images.

Indexed as

GelatinSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAnimalsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMandibleRadiography, DentalSwineGelatinCone-Beam Computed TomographyDensitometryPhoton absorptiometrySoft tissues simulation

Identifiers

PMID32941781
PMCPMC7923062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.