Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32941670›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2021

Environmental deformations dynamically shift human spatial memory.

Alexandra T Keinath, Ohad Rechnitz, Vijay Balasubramanian, Russell A Epstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Locomotion-dependent use of geometric and body cues in humans mapping 3D space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Making Sense of the Multiplicity and Dynamics of Navigational Codes in the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra T Keinath *Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-7835
Ohad Rechnitz *Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Vijay BalasubramanianDepartment of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Russell A EpsteinDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Landmark-based NavigationR01EY022350 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RUSSELL A EPSTEIN · 2013 to 2026
$5.7M
Neuroimaging of dynamic navigational codesR21EY027047 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EPSTEIN, RUSSELL A · 2016 to 2017
$403k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022350NEI NIH HHS R21 EY027047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Place and grid cells in the hippocampal formation are commonly thought to support a unified and coherent cognitive map of space. This mapping mechanism faces a challenge when a navigator is placed in a familiar environment that has been deformed from its original shape. Under such circumstances, many transformations could plausibly serve to map a navigator's familiar cognitive map to the deformed space. Previous empirical results indicate that the firing fields of rodent place and grid cells stretch or compress in a manner that approximately matches the environmental deformation, and human spatial memory exhibits similar distortions. These effects have been interpreted as evidence that reshaping a familiar environment elicits an analogously reshaped cognitive map. However, recent work has suggested an alternative explanation, whereby deformation-induced distortions of the grid code are attributable to a mechanism that dynamically anchors grid fields to the most recently experienced boundary, thus causing history-dependent shifts in grid phase. This interpretation raises the possibility that human spatial memory will exhibit similar history-dependent dynamics. To test this prediction, we taught participants the locations of objects in a virtual environment and then probed their memory for these locations in deformed versions of this environment. Across three experiments with variable access to visual and vestibular cues, we observed the predicted pattern, whereby the remembered locations of objects were shifted from trial to trial depending on the boundary of origin of the participant's movement trajectory. These results provide evidence for a dynamic anchoring mechanism that governs both neuronal firing and spatial memory.

Indexed as

Grid CellsSpatial MemoryCuesHippocampusHumansNeuronsSpace Perceptionboundariesenvironmental deformationsgrid cellshuman spatial memoryplace cellsvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32941670
PMCPMC8293620
OpenAlexW3087138602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.