ArticlePloS one2020
Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between oral health-related quality-of-life and smile aesthetic indices among Chinese individuals.Medicine · 2026Article
- Adolescents' self-recognition of their facial profile: associations with wellbeing, self-esteem and sociodemographic factors.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Dental aesthetic self-perception, smile satisfaction and associated factors among adults: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Assessing Esthetic and Functional Benefits of Three Types of Maxillary Partial Denture Designs over Five Years.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Aesthetic Preferences for Replacement of Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A Comparison of Canine Substitution, Implants and Resin-Bonded Bridges Among Australian Dental Professionals and Laypeople.Australian dental journal · 2025Article
- Perceptibility and Acceptability of Tooth and Gingival Shade Modifications in Digital Smile Images: A Comparative Study Among Laypeople, General Dentists, and Specialists.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Esthetic Treatments With an Orthorestorative Integrated Digital Approach: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
- Facial aesthetics is shaped not only by genetic predispositions but also by the cultural norms and values.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Measuring concern about smile appearance among adults.European journal of orthodontics · 2024Observational
- Perception of dental appearance and aesthetic analysis among patients, laypersons and dentists.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Influence of education level and gender of dental students on perception of dental aesthetics.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Public perception on face mask wearing during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia: A cross sectional study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Aesthetic dental treatment, orofacial appearance, and life satisfaction of Finnish and Brazilian adults.PloS one · 2023Article
- Assessment of Orofacial Esthetics among Different Specialists in Dental Medicine: A pilot study.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2022Article
- Effect of Social Media on Patient's Perception of Dental Aesthetics in Saudi Arabia.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Atomic force microscopy analysis of the surface alterations of enamel, dentin, composite and ceramic materials exposed to low oral pH in GERD.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe perception of dentofacial esthetics differs considerably between patients and dentists. Patient's expectations regarding his/her esthetics are important and should be assessed ahead of any planning of esthetic treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the differences in perception of orofacial appearance by laypersons with different social and demographic status. MATERIALS AND
methodsSelf-administered questionnaires were distributed to 400 subjects. The questionnaire comprised three parts; the first part addressed the demographic variables. The second part queried about dental prosthesis, orthognathic or plastic surgery, and/or ongoing or previous orthodontic treatment. The third part included the Arabic version of the-8-item Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-Ar) whose responses were scored in the 5-point Likert scale. These scores were compared by different grouping factors (age, gender, marital status, and education) using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Willis tests with 95% confidence interval (α > 0.05).
resultsA total of 268 questionnaires were eligible for analysis, representing 67% response rate. The satisfaction with facial profile appearance was the highest (4.0±1.1) followed by facial appearance (3.9±1.1), while the color of teeth was the least satisfying item (3.1±1.3). No significant differences were found between age groups for the mean summary score as well as for each item independently. No significant difference was found between both sexes except for the last item "overall impression". Married subjects rated one item (alignment of teeth) better than their counterparts. Positive perception of orofacial appearance increased significantly with the increase of education level, the perception of the oral health status, and the perception of the general health status.
conclusionGood oral health and/or high education level are significant determinants of more positive perception of orofacial esthetic appearance. Patients with these characteristics might be more concerned about their orofacial appearance, and this should be taken into consideration before planning any esthetic restorative dental treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.