Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32941475›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

On stability and associative recall of memories in attractor neural networks.

Suchitra Sampath, Vipin Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suchitra SampathCentre for Neural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1115-7156
Vipin SrivastavaSchool of Physics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attractor neural networks such as the Hopfield model can be used to model associative memory. An efficient associative memory should be able to store a large number of patterns which must all be stable. We study in detail the meaning and definition of stability of network states. We reexamine the meanings of retrieval, recognition and recall and assign precise mathematical meanings to each of these terms. We also examine the relation between them and how they relate to memory capacity of the network. We have shown earlier in this journal that orthogonalization scheme provides an effective way of overcoming catastrophic interference that limits the memory capacity of the Hopfield model. It is not immediately apparent whether the improvement made by orthgonalization affects the processes of retrieval, recognition and recall equally. We show that this influence occurs to different degrees and hence affects the relations between them. We then show that the conditions for pattern stability can be split into a necessary condition (recognition) and a sufficient one (recall). We interpret in cognitive terms the information being stored in the Hopfield model and also after it is orthogonalized. We also study the alterations in the network dynamics of the Hopfield network upon the introduction of orthogonalization, and their effects on the efficiency of the network as an associative memory.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerRecognition, PsychologyHumansMemoryMental RecallNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID32941475
PMCPMC7498056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.