Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32941336›Full record

Trial reportOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2020

Comparison of Pneumatonometry and Transpalpebral Tonometry Measurements of Intraocular Pressure during Scleral Lens Wear.

Jennifer Swingle Fogt, Cherie B Nau, Muriel Schornack, Ellen Shorter, Amy Nau, Jennifer S Harthan

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Corneal and Intraocular Pressure Responses to Scleral Lens Wear: A Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. The Impact of Scleral Lenses on Intraocular Pressure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Variation of Bruch's membrane opening in response to intraocular pressure change during scleral lens wear, in a population with keratoconus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Swingle FogtThe Ohio State University, College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio.
Cherie B NauDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Muriel SchornackDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ellen ShorterDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Amy NauKorb & Associates, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer S HarthanIllinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois.
Mayo Clinic · USAbt Global (United States) · USIllinois College of Optometry · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceAs scleral lens wear becomes more common, understanding the impact of these lenses upon ocular physiology is critically important. Studies on the effect of scleral lens wear upon intraocular pressure (IOP) have used different instruments and have reported conflicting results. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare assessment of IOP during scleral lens wear using pneumatonometry and transpalpebral tonometry.

methodsTwenty healthy subjects wore a small-diameter (15.2 mm) and a large-diameter (18.0 mm) scleral lens on the right eye, each for 1 hour in randomized order. IOP was assessed with pneumatonometry and transpalpebral tonometry on both eyes before lens application, immediately after lens application, after 1 hour of lens wear, and immediately after lens removal. Paired t test compared mean IOP in the study eye to the control eye. Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to take instrumentation, lens diameter, and their interaction into account in an analysis of the change in IOP in the study eye.

resultsMean peripheral IOP measured with pneumatonometry was not significantly different from baseline at any subsequent measurement. Measurements with transpalpebral tonometry, however, were significantly different during scleral lens wear immediately after application and after 1 hour of wear with both diameter lenses (P < .005), but were not significantly different after either sized lens was removed. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the instrument used to measure IOP was a significant factor in IOP changes found during lens wear (P ≤ .001).

conclusionsAssessment of IOP during scleral lens wear varies based upon the instrument that is used. Although further studies are clearly needed to further elucidate this issue, clinicians should continue to monitor optic nerve structure and function in scleral lens wearers, as they do in all patients.

Indexed as

Contact LensesScleraAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis FittingTonometry, OcularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32941336
PMCPMC7547891
OpenAlexW3087723356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.