Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32941118›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene

New respirator performance monitor (RePM) for powered air-purifying respirators.

Sergey A Grinshpun, Jonathan Corey, Michael Yermakov, Bingbing Wu, Kevin T Strickland, Michael Bergman, Ziqing Zhuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sergey A GrinshpunCenter for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Jonathan CoreyCenter for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Michael YermakovCenter for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Bingbing WuNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin T StricklandNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael BergmanNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ziqing ZhuangNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) that offer protection from particulates are deployed in different workplace environments. Usage of PAPRs by healthcare workers is rapidly increasing; these respirators are often considered the best option in healthcare settings, particularly during public health emergency situations, such as outbreaks of pandemic diseases. At the same time, lack of user training and certain vigorous work activities may lead to a decrease in a respirator's performance. There is a critical need for real-time performance monitoring of respiratory protective devices, including PAPRs. In this effort, a new robust and low-cost real-time performance monitor (RePM) capable of evaluating the protection offered by a PAPR against aerosol particles at a workplace was developed. The new device was evaluated on a manikin and on human subjects against a pair of condensation nuclei counters (P-Trak) used as the reference protection measurement system. The outcome was expressed as a manikin-based protection factor (mPF) and a Simulated Workplace Protection Factor (SWPF) determined while testing on subjects. For the manikin-based testing, the data points collected by the two methods were plotted against each other; a near-perfect correlation was observed with a correlation coefficient of 0.997. This high correlation is particularly remarkable since RePM and condensation particle counter (CPC) measure in different particle size ranges. The data variability increased with increasing mPF. The evaluation on human subjects demonstrated that RePM prototype provided an excellent Sensitivity (96.3% measured on human subjects at a response time of 60 sec) and a Specificity of 100%. The device is believed to be the first of its kind to quantitatively monitor PAPR performance while the wearer is working; it is small, lightweight, and does not interfere with job functions.

Indexed as

AerosolsEquipment Failure AnalysisManikinsOccupational ExposureParticle SizeRespiratory Protective DevicesSensitivity and SpecificitySodium ChlorideAerosolsSodium ChloridePAPRreal-time monitoringrespiratory protectionsensor

Identifiers

PMID32941118
PMCPMC10065132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.