Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32941115›Full record

ArticlePopulation health management2021

Trends in Food Insecurity in the United States from 2011-2017: Disparities by Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicity, and Income.

Rebekah J Walker, Emma Garacci, Aprill Z Dawson, Joni S Williams, Mukoso Ozieh, Leonard E Egede

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebekah J WalkerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Emma GaracciCenter for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Aprill Z DawsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Joni S WilliamsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Mukoso OziehCenter for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Leonard E EgedeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Froedtert Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

HOME DM-BAT: Home-based Diabetes-Modified Behavioral Activation Treatment for Low Income Seniors with T2DM Diversity SupplementR01DK118038 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Financial Incentives And Nurse Coaching to Enhance Diabetes Outcomes (FINANCE-DM) - Diversity SupplementR01DK120861 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Lowering the Impact of Food insecurity in African American Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (LIFT-DM) - Diversity SupplementR01MD013826 · NIMHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E., WALKER, REBEKAH J · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Technology Intensified Diabetes Education Study in AA with T2DM (TIDES)K24DK093699 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2011 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK093699NIDDK NIH HHS L30 DK122410NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK118038NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK120861NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of individuals in the United States who report food insecurity doubled between 2005 and 2012, with little research investigating possible disparities across time in food-insecure populations. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in food insecurity between 2001-2017 by sex, race/ethnicity, income, and age. Adults participating in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) between 2011-2017 were included in the study. Food insecurity was dichotomized based on affirmative responses to the Food Security Survey Module. Statistical analysis included logistic regression to investigate trends in food insecurity over time by each demographic variable (age, sex, race/ethnicity, income) adjusted by survey year and demographic variables. After adjustment, those ages ≥65 years were 39% less likely (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.57,0.65]) to report food insecurity compared to those ages 18-34; females were 23% more likely to be food insecure than males (OR = 1.23, 95% CI [1.19,1.27]); non-Hispanic blacks were 1.7 times more likely (OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.62,1.76]) to be food insecure than non-Hispanic whites; and a clear gradient existed by income, with lower incomes more likely to be food insecure. Disparities in food insecurity exist across age, race/ethnicity, sex, and income and were consistent over time. These results suggest that targeted programs may be necessary to decrease food insecurity in particularly vulnerable subpopulations, and barriers to access and use of existing programs need to be investigated.

Indexed as

EthnicityFood InsecurityAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood SupplyHumansIncomeMaleUnited StatesYoung Adultfood insecurityhealth disparitiesrace/ethnicitysoceioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID32941115
PMCPMC8403212
OpenAlexW3087680359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.