Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940962›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2021

Polymers for Melt Electrowriting.

Juliane C Kade, Paul D Dalton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Multi-hierarchical biofunctional polymeric biomaterial to promote wound closure.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juliane C KadeDepartment of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Bavarian Polymer Institute, University Clinic Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Paul D DaltonDepartment of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, Bavarian Polymer Institute, University Clinic Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9602-4151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melt electrowriting (MEW) is an emerging high-resolution additive manufacturing technique based on the electrohydrodynamic processing of polymers. MEW is predominantly used to fabricate scaffolds for biomedical applications, where the microscale fiber positioning has substantial implications in its macroscopic mechanical properties. This review gives an update on the increasing number of polymers processed via MEW and different commercial sources of the gold standard poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). A description of MEW-processed polymers beyond PCL is introduced, including blends and coated fibers to provide specific advantages in biomedical applications. Furthermore, a perspective on printer designs and developments is highlighted, to keep expanding the variety of processable polymers for MEW.

Indexed as

PolymersTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsPolyestersTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsPolyestersPolymers3D printingadditive manufacturingbiomedical materialselectrohydrodynamic materialsmelt electrospinning writing

Identifiers

PMID32940962
PMCPMC11469188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.