Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940902›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Prognostic factors for breast cancer patients with T1-2 tumors and 1-3 positive lymph nodes and the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy in these patients.

Jia-Ming Zhao, Qi An, Chao-Nan Sun, Yu-Bing Li, Zi-Lan Qin, Hong Guo, Xue Zeng, Yao-Tian Zhang, Lin-Lin Wei, Ning Han and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jia-Ming ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Qi AnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Chao-Nan SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Yu-Bing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Zi-Lan QinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Hong GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Xue ZengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Yao-Tian ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Lin-Lin WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Ning HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Shi-Chen SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Na ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, China. zhangna@cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0403-0111
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

Key Laboratory of Tumor Radiosensitization and Normal Tissue Radioprotection Project of Liaoning Province No.2018225102Personnel Training Project of Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute of China 201703Science and Technology Plan Project of Liaoning Province of China 201602452 and 20180530095Science and Technology Plan Project of Liaoning Province of China 20180540129Science and Technology Plan Project of Shenyang 19-112-4-083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to identify independent prognostic factors for breast cancer patients with T1-2 tumors and 1-3 positive lymph nodes, and discuss the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy(PMRT) in these patients.

methodsBetween January 2005 and December 2015, the data on 840 eligible patients with breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 368 women received PMRT and 472 did not. The endpoints were locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM).

resultsWith a median follow-up of 62.0 months, multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for increased LRR: tumor size ≥ 4 cm (HR: 2.994, 95% CI: 1.190-7.535, P = 0.020), ER- and PR-negative tumor (HR: 2.540, 95% CI: 1.165-5.537, P = 0.019), preoperative high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR: 4.716, 95% CI: 1.776-12.528, P = 0.002)and low neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR) (HR: 0.231, 95% CI: 0.084-0.633, P = 0.004). And independent risk factors for increased DM: ER- and PR-negative tumor (HR: 2.540, 95% CI: 1.880-5.625, P = 0.000), high NLR (HR: 2.693, 95% CI: 1.426-5.084, P = 0.002) and low NMR (HR: 0.460, 95% CI: 0.257-0.824, P = 0.009). The high-risk patients (≥ 2 risk factors) had worse LRRFS and DFS than low-risk patients (0-1 risk factor) (all, P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, both low- and high-risk patients received PMRT had better LRRFS and DFS than those who without PMRT (all, P < 0.05), and the high-risk patients received PMRT had similar 5-year rates of LRRFS and DFS than low-risk patients who without PMRT (94.5 vs. 94.3%, P = 0.402; 83.4 vs.87.4%, P = 0.877, respectively).

conclusionsTumor size, ER/PR status, preoperative NLR and NMR were independent predictors of risk of recurrence. PMRT could improve locoregional control even in low-risk subgroup of breast cancer patients with T1-2 tumors and 1-3 positive lymph nodes significantly.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantBreast cancerNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioNeutrophil-to-monocyte ratioPrognosisRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32940902
OpenAlexW3084633830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.