Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940893›Full record

Trial reportCardiovascular drugs and therapy2021

Efficacy of Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from a Multicentre, Controlled, Randomized Trial.

Shuai Mao, Lei Wang, Xujie Zhao, Liheng Guo, Qian Lin, Xiaofeng Wang, Xiaohua Dai, Hongcai Shang, Minzhou Zhang, Aleksander Hinek

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuai Mao *Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lei Wang *Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xujie Zhao *Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Liheng GuoSecond Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Qian LinDongfang Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng WangChinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Xiaohua DaiFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Hongcai ShangKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of ME and Beijing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Minzhou ZhangSecond Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. minzhouzhang@aliyun.com.
Aleksander HinekTranslational Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNAnhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNHospital for Sick Children · CAXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Uygur Medicine Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (STS) has been widely used by Chinese medicine practitioners for chronic cardiovascular diseases. However, its direct clinical efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been reported yet. The present trial aimed to investigate potential cardioprotection of STS in patients undergoing PCI for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 372 patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to receive STS (n = 192) or saline (n = 180) for 2 days before and 3 days after PCI along with standard therapy. The primary endpoint was the composite incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization of the target vessel, and stent thrombosis, within 30 days after PCI.

resultsThe 30-day MACEs occurred in 18.8% of the patients in the STS group and in 27.2% of the patients in the control group (P = 0.038); this difference was mostly driven by reduction of myocardial infarction incidence (17.2% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.027). Post-procedural elevation of troponin-I was also significantly lower in the STS group (26.56% vs. 47.78%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified STS as a predictor of decreased risk of MACE occurrence (odds ratio: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.36 to 0.99; P = 0.045).

conclusionAddition of STS to the standard treatments recommended by the current practice guidelines in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI could reduce myocardial injury and the occurrence of short-term cardiovascular events, primarily driven by non-fatal myocardial infarction.

trial registrationChiCTR-TRC-14005182.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPhenanthrenesCardiovascular AgentsPhenanthrenestanshinone II A sodium sulfonateNon-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromePercutaneous coronary interventionPeriprocedural myocardial infarctionSodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate

Identifiers

PMID32940893
OpenAlexW3087534195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.