Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940851›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021

[Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in retinal vein occlusion-Results from the Gutenberg RVO study].

Ann K Rosner, Ellen I Closs, Alice Habermeier, Adrian Gericke, Harald Binder, Inge Scharrer, Norbert Pfeiffer, Katharina A Ponto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ann K RosnerAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Ellen I ClossInstitut für Pharmakologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Alice HabermeierInstitut für Pharmakologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Adrian GerickeAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Harald BinderInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik (IMBEI), Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Inge ScharrerIII. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Norbert PfeifferAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Katharina A PontoAugenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. katharina.ponto@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is considered an independent cardiovascular risk factor (cvRF) and thus represents a potential new biomarker for retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

methodsOverall, 92 patients with RVO and the same number of matched controls were included in the Gutenberg RVO study. All patients underwent a standardized examination for cvRF at the study center of the population-based Gutenberg health study (GHS) as well as ophthalmological examinations and intensive laboratory tests. This article presents a substudy of patients (≤65 years old) and the controls in whom ADMA was additionally determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at baseline and 4-6 weeks later.

resultsOut of 44 patients with RVO 22 had central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), 15 had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and 7 had hemiretinal vein occlusion (hemi-RVO). The ADMA levels were 0.383 ± 0.094 µM (mean ± standard deviation) in RVO patients at baseline and 0.380 ± 0.093 µM (p = 0.514, initial vs. follow-up) after the follow-up period versus 0.360 ± 0.077 µM (p = 0.175, controls vs. RVO) in controls (n = 44). Arterial hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor in 22 (50%) of the patients and in 11 (25%) of the controls (odds ratio, OR 2.77, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.97-7.95; p = 0.058). The ADMA values above the 95th percentile (>0.530 µM) were detected in 4 patients with RVO (9.1%) but not in any of the controls (p = 0.041, RVO vs. controls).

conclusionHypertension is the most important risk factor for RVO. Due to the high number of hypertensive patients in the cohort, the relevance of ADMA as an independent risk factor could neither be confirmed nor disproved.

Indexed as

HypertensionRetinal Vein OcclusionAgedArginineHumansRisk FactorsArginineN,N-dimethylarginineAsymmetric dimethylarginineCardiovascular risk factorsGutenberg health studyGutenberg RVO studyRetinal vein occlusion

Identifiers

PMID32940851
OpenAlexW3087065135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.