Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940843›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021

Damage patterns observed in mtDNA control region MPS data for a range of template concentrations and when using different amplification approaches.

Charity A Holland, Jennifer A McElhoe, Sidney Gaston-Sanchez, Mitchell M Holland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Charity A HollandForensic Science Program, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 014 Thomas Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Jennifer A McElhoeForensic Science Program, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 014 Thomas Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sidney Gaston-SanchezForensic Science Program, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 014 Thomas Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Mitchell M HollandForensic Science Program, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 014 Thomas Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. mmh20@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-7080
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

National Institute of Justice 2015-DN-BX-K025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of mitochondrial (mt) DNA allows practitioners the ability to fully resolve heteroplasmic sites. In forensic DNA analysis, identifying heteroplasmy (a naturally occurring mixture of two mtDNA profiles) can provide additional mtDNA profile information which can lead to an increase in the discrimination potential of an mtDNA match between an evidentiary sample and reference source. Forensic samples such as hair and skeletal remains, especially older, more compromised samples, can often exhibit DNA damage. Because both damage and heteroplasmy can manifest as a mixture of two nucleotides, it is important to differentiate between the two conditions when interpreting mtDNA MPS data. In this study, DNA damage was applied under controlled conditions to samples containing a range of template concentrations, including some with identified heteroplasmy. Damage was applied via storage in water at room temperature on samples diluted before or after storage to mimic low template scenarios. Damage was assessed with respect to the following areas: mtDNA quantification and degradation ratios, MPS read depth, MPS profile results, overall damage rates, and the interpretation of heteroplasmy. Datasets were generated to assess and compare two different amplification and library preparation strategies: the Promega PowerSeq™ CRM Nested System kit and a 1.16 kb target amplicon of the entire mtDNA control region followed by a Nextera® XT library preparation. The results of this study provide an evaluation of the Promega 10-plex MPS procedure as an improved process to mitigate the impact of mtDNA damage on low template samples. Some of the negative effects of damage observed in this study were a decrease in mtDNA yield by 20-30% and lower quality MPS sequencing results. These effects were observed more frequently when samples were diluted prior to inducing damage, illustrating that low template samples are more susceptible to damage. The findings of this study will assist forensic laboratories in differentiating between damage and heteroplasmy, which is essential when developing robust mtDNA MPS interpretation guidelines such as setting appropriate reporting thresholds.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA, MitochondrialHeteroplasmyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialDNA damageForensic scienceHeteroplasmyMassively parallel sequencingMitochondrial DNAmtDNA interpretation

Identifiers

PMID32940843
OpenAlexW3087020141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.