ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Relationship between quality of coronary collateral and myocardial viability in chronic total occlusion: a magnetic resonance study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between hibernating myocardium and collateral circulation in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Editorial: Contemporary percutaneous interventions for coronary chronic total occlusions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- The Atherogenic Index of Plasma is a Predictor for Chronic Total Occlusion and Coronary Collateral Circulation Formation in CTOs Patients.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- The association of collaterals with myocardial ischemia and viability in chronic total occlusions.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Revascularization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) is still debated regarding its indications and therapeutic benefits. Guidelines recommend patient selection based on ischemia detection and viability assessment. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the quality of coronary collaterals (CC), graded by Rentrop classification, and myocardial viability assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Unselected 100 consecutive patients with a single CTO were prospectively enrolled. CC of Rentrop grade two or three were considered as well-developed. Analyzing late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images, CTO territories with mean segmental transmural scar extent < 50% were considered viable. Of the 100 patients (70 male, mean age 58.0 ± 6 years), 73 patients (73%) had angiographically visible CC. Based on LGE, patients were classified into viable (n = 50) and non-viable (n = 50) groups. Significant differences between both groups existed regarding frequency of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.044), frequency of congestive heart failure (p = 0.032), presence of pathological Q in CTO territory (p = 0.039); and presence of well-developed CC (p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve showed that presence of well-developed CC could independently (OR 9.4, 95% CI: 2.6-33.6, p < 0.001) predict myocardial viability with a sensitivity and a specificity of 72% and 74%, respectively (AUC: 0.796, 95% CI: 0.708-0.884, P < 0.001). The presence of well-developed CC could independently predict with high accuracy myocardial viability assessed by LGE in territories subtended by CTO vessels. Therefore, search for viable myocardium using different imaging modalities, e.g. CMR, may be recommended in CTO patients with well-developed CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32940819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.