ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2020
Obstetrical Complications and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Center Survey of Medicine Residents and Self-Assessment on Cardiac Complications in Obstetric Patients.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Does gestational diabetes mellitus increase the risk of cardiovascular disease? A Mendelian randomization study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Article
- Effect of magnesium supplementation on pregnancy outcome in gestational diabetes mellitus patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Food science & nutrition · 2022Review
- Article
- Alternative splicing in normal and pathological human placentas is correlated to genetic variants.Human genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewObstetrical complications including indicated preterm birth (PTB), hypertension (HTN), IUGR, and GDM are risk factors for future cardiovascular disease. To identify patients at risk, the American Heart Association recommends obtaining a detailed obstetric history. Our objective was to determine if non-OB-GYN physicians-in-training obtain an obstetric history when assessing a risk profile for cardiovascular disease and to identify differences based on level of training. In 2019, an anonymous survey was distributed to trainees in internal medicine, cardiology, endocrinology, nephrology, and neurology. Subjects were queried about frequency of asking a history of PTB, IUGR, GDM, and HTN in pregnancy. Survey options were always/frequently/sometimes/rarely/never and were categorized into two groups: "ask" (always/frequently/sometimes) vs. "do not ask" (rarely/never). Comparisons between specialties and levels of training were made using chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Comparisons within subjects were made using McNemar's test. RECENT
findingsThe response rate was 64% (210 total possible participants), including 98 internal medicine residents and 37 fellows in cardiology (21), endocrinology (3), nephrology (8), and neurology (5). Asking about medical complications (HTN + GDM) was significantly more common than asking about OB complications (PTB + IUGR) (p < 0.001). Internal medicine residents were less likely than subspecialty fellows to ask about HTN (31% vs. 70%; p < 0.001). There were no differences in likelihood of eliciting OB history based on PGY level. An OB history can identify risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity. Our data demonstrates that physicians caring for women lack awareness on the association between complications in pregnancy and cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.