Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940718›Full record

Trial reportSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2021

The additional role of virtual to traditional dissection in teaching anatomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Rafael Boscolo-Berto, Cinzia Tortorella, Andrea Porzionato, Carla Stecco, Edgardo Enrico Edoardo Picardi, Veronica Macchi, Raffaele De Caro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Dissection in the 21BMC medical education · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Role of Living Anatomy in Medical Education: A Narrative Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafael Boscolo-BertoDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Via Gabelli 65, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7556-1943
Cinzia TortorellaDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Via Gabelli 65, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-4997
Andrea PorzionatoDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Via Gabelli 65, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-4717
Carla SteccoDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Via Gabelli 65, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-4555
Edgardo Enrico Edoardo PicardiDigestive System Surgery Division, European Institute of Oncology (IRCSS), Via Ripamonti 435, Milano, Italy.
Veronica MacchiDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Via Gabelli 65, Padova, Italy. veronica.macchi@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2335-6897
Raffaele De CaroDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Via Gabelli 65, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8991-7610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnatomy has traditionally been taught via dissection and didactic lectures. The rising prevalence of informatics plays an increasingly important role in medical education. It is hypothesized that virtual dissection can express added value to the traditional one.

methodsSecond-year medical students were randomised to study anatomical structures by virtual dissection (intervention) or textbooks (controls), according to the CONSORT guidelines. Subsequently, they applied to the corresponding gross dissection, with a final test on their anatomical knowledge. Univariate analysis and multivariable binary logistic regression were performed.

resultsThe rate of completed tests was 76.7%. Better overall test performance was detected for the group that applied to the virtual dissection (OR 3.75 with 95% CI 0.91-15.49; p = 0.06). A comparable performance between groups in basic anatomical knowledge (p 0.45 to 0.92) but not muscles and 2D-3D reporting of anatomical structures was found, for which the virtual dissection was of tendential benefit (p 0.08 to 0.13). Medical students who applied to the virtual dissection were over three times more likely to report a positive outcome at the post-dissection test than those who applied to textbooks of topographical anatomy. This would be of benefit with particular reference to the understanding of 2D-3D spatial relationships between anatomical structures.

conclusionThe combination of virtual to traditional gross dissection resulted in a significant improvement of second-year medical students' learning outcomes. It could be of help in maximizing the impact of practical dissection, overcoming the contraction of economic resources, and the shortage of available bodies.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionAnatomyCurriculumDissectionEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansLearningMaleProgram EvaluationStudents, MedicalTeachingYoung AdultBody donationCadaver dissectionClinical anatomyEducationRandomised controlled trialVirtual dissection

Identifiers

PMID32940718
PMCPMC8021520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.