Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940598›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Topological constraints in early multicellularity favor reproductive division of labor.

David Yanni, Shane Jacobeen, Pedro Márquez-Zacarías, Joshua S Weitz, William C Ratcliff, Peter J Yunker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibiotic resistance in bacterial communities.Current opinion in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Ecological drivers of division of labour in Streptomyces.Current opinion in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Evolution of reproductive strategies in incipient multicellularity.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David Yanni *School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States.
Shane Jacobeen *School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States.
Pedro Márquez-ZacaríasInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Quantitative Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States.
Joshua S WeitzSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States.
William C Ratcliff *School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States.
Peter J Yunker *School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8471-4171

Funding

Using directed evolution to study the origins of multicellular development.R35GM138030 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI William Croft Ratcliff · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
The Biophysical Foundations of Bacterial Biofilm Growth and SurvivalR35GM138354 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Peter Yunker · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138030NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138354NIH HHS GM138030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive division of labor (e.g. germ-soma specialization) is a hallmark of the evolution of multicellularity, signifying the emergence of a new type of individual and facilitating the evolution of increased organismal complexity. A large body of work from evolutionary biology, economics, and ecology has shown that specialization is beneficial when further division of labor produces an accelerating increase in absolute productivity (i.e. productivity is a convex function of specialization). Here we show that reproductive specialization is qualitatively different from classical models of resource sharing, and can evolve even when the benefits of specialization are saturating (i.e. productivity is a concave function of specialization). Through analytical theory and evolutionary individual-based simulations, we demonstrate that reproductive specialization is strongly favored in sparse networks of cellular interactions that reflect the morphology of early, simple multicellular organisms, highlighting the importance of restricted social interactions in the evolution of reproductive specialization.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell CommunicationReproductionGerm CellsModels, Biologicalevolutionevolutionary biologynonereproductive specializationtopology

Identifiers

PMID32940598
PMCPMC7609046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.