Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940410›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2021

Validation and comparison of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and the Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) in patients with cataracts: a multicentre study.

Yu Wan, Liming Zhao, Chen Huang, Yanhui Xu, Min Sun, Yang Yang, Li An, Shuxuan Lv, Yanan Yu, Dongmei Chen and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mapping the NEI-VFQ-25 scores to the EQ-5D-Y-3L and CHU-9D utility values among adolescents with myopia.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing Quality of life of Patients with Cataract and Glaucoma using Generic and Vision-Specific Instruments in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu WanPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liming ZhaoBeijing Fengtai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chen HuangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanhui XuHebei Eye Hospital, Xingtai, China.
Min SunGeneral Hospital of Huabei Petroleum Administration Bureau, Renqiu, China.
Yang YangThe Hospital of Shunyi District, Beijing, China.
Li AnDatong Aier Eye Hospital, Datong, China.
Shuxuan LvPeople's Hospital of YongQing, Langfang, China.
Yanan YuBaoding Zhuozhou Gem Flower Hospital, Zhuozhou, China.
Dongmei ChenBaoding Gem Flower Dongfang Hospital, Xushui, China.
Peng ZhouPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yinhao WangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-9378
Mingzhou ZhangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Aimin JiangThe Hospital of Shunyi District, Beijing, China.
Zhimin ChenHebei Eye Hospital, Xingtai, China.
Xuemin LiPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4018-9974
Peking University · CNFlower Hospital · USHebei Eye Hospital · CNShunyi Hospital of Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CNAmerican Petroleum Institute · USBeijing Fengtai Hospital · CNShanxi Datong University · CNYueqing People's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Science and Technology Major Project 2018ZX10101004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aimed to investigate and compare the psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and the Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) in a large sample of patients with cataracts.

methodsA total of 1052 patients with bilateral age-related cataracts were recruited in the study. Patients with other comorbidities that severely impacted vision were excluded. Participants completed the two questionnaires in random order. Classical test theory and Rasch analyses were used to assess the psychometric properties of the questionnaires.

resultsComplete data were obtained from 899 patients. The mean overall index score on the NEI VFQ-25 was 76.1 ± 19.0, while that on the VF-14 was 46.5 ± 15.0. Cronbach's α-values for the NEI VFQ-25 and VF-14 were 0.89 and 0.95, respectively. Ceiling effects were observed on nine of the 12 subscales in the NEI VFQ-25. The correlation between total scores on the NEI VFQ-25 and VF-14 was moderate (r = 0.600; p < 0.001), and subscales of the NEI VFQ-25 were weakly or moderately correlated with the similar domains on the VF-14. Rasch analysis revealed ordered category thresholds and sufficient person separation for both instruments, while the two questionnaires had critical deficiencies in unidimensionality, targeting and differential item functioning.

conclusionNeither the NEI VFQ-25 nor VF-14 is optimal for the assessment of vision-related quality of life in typical Chinese patients with cataracts. The potential deficiencies of the questionnaires should be taken into consideration prior to application of the instruments or interpretation of the results.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCataractFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Eye Institute (U.S.)PsychometricsRetrospective StudiesSickness Impact ProfileUnited StatesVisual AcuitycataractNEI VFQ-25psychometric propertiesRasch analysisVF-14vision-related quality of life

Identifiers

PMID32940410
PMCPMC8359188
OpenAlexW3087530678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.