Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940391›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of dental hygiene2021

Dental plaque score reduction with an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush and a high-frequency sonic power toothbrush: a systematic review and meta-analysis of single-brushing exercises.

Eveline van der Sluijs, Dagmar Else Slot, Nienke L Hennequin-Hoenderdos, Cees Valkenburg, Fridus van der Weijden

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of dental hygiene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eveline van der SluijsDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Amsterdam and The Faculty of Dentistry of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-1710
Dagmar Else SlotDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Amsterdam and The Faculty of Dentistry of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0037
Nienke L Hennequin-HoenderdosDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Amsterdam and The Faculty of Dentistry of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6740-5657
Cees ValkenburgDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Amsterdam and The Faculty of Dentistry of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-6934
Fridus van der WeijdenDepartment of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Amsterdam and The Faculty of Dentistry of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-8384
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Procter and Gamble Company Worldwide Clinical Investigations-Oral Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo establish the effect of a single-brushing exercise on dental plaque removal using an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush (OR-PTB) as compared to a high-frequency sonic power toothbrush (HFS-PTB). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe MEDLINE-PubMed and Cochrane-CENTRAL databases were searched up to September 2019. The inclusion criteria contained (randomized) controlled clinical trials involving healthy adult participants brushing with an OR-PTB as compared to an HFS-PTB. Plaque index (PI) scores were evaluated after a single-brushing exercise.

resultsA total of 15 publications were included, representing 34 comparisons, of which 8 were professional brushing exercises and 26 participant brushing exercises. The potential risk of bias was estimated to be low. In the overall descriptive analysis of 34 comparisons, 19 comparisons showed a statistically significant difference in favour of the OR-PTB and 4 in favour of the HFS-PTB. The meta-analysis using the professional brushing study design showed a significant difference of means (DiffM) in favour of the OR-PTB (PI score) (DiffM 0.19; P < .0001) (95% CI [013; 0.25]). In those studies where the participants brushed themselves, the data were inconclusive. PI scores showed no difference between the two brushes (P = .15), while one plaque index (the Rustogi Modified Navy plaque index) indicated significant favour for the OR-PTB (DiffM 0.06; P = .002) (95% CI [0.02; 0.09]).

conclusionBased on the estimated evidence profile, there is moderate certainty of evidence of a very small but significant beneficial effect on plaque removal after a single-brushing exercise with the OR-PTB over the HFS-PTB.

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueAdultDental Plaque IndexEquipment DesignHumansPeriodontal IndexSingle-Blind MethodToothbrushingdental plaqueoscillating-rotating toothbrushpower toothbrushsingle brushingsonic toothbrushsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32940391
PMCPMC7839525
OpenAlexW3087663704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.