Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940337›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

In silico tools for accurate HLA and KIR inference from clinical sequencing data empower immunogenetics on individual-patient and population scales.

Jieming Chen, Shravan Madireddi, Deepti Nagarkar, Maciej Migdal, Jason Vander Heiden, Diana Chang, Kiran Mukhyala, Suresh Selvaraj, Edward E Kadel, Matthew J Brauer and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MiDAS-Meaningful Immunogenetic Data at Scale.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. An immunogenetic view of COVID-19.Genetics and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jieming ChenDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.
Shravan MadireddiDepartment of Cancer Immunology.
Deepti NagarkarDepartment of Cancer Immunology.
Maciej MigdalRoche's Global IT Solution Centre.
Jason Vander HeidenDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-310X
Diana ChangDepartment of Human Genetics.
Kiran MukhyalaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.
Suresh SelvarajRoche/Genentech's Biosample & Repository Management.
Edward E KadelDepartment of Oncology Biomarker Development.
Matthew J BrauerData Science at Maze Therapeutics.
Sanjeev MariathasanDepartment of Oncology Biomarker Development.
Julie HunkapillerDepartment of Human Genetics.
Suchit JhunjhunwalaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.
Matthew L AlbertImmunology & Infectious Diseases.
Christian HammerDepartments of Cancer Immunology and Human Genetics.ORCID 0000-0003-4548-7548
Roche (Switzerland) · CHBipar · FRMaze (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunogenetic variation in humans is important in research, clinical diagnosis and increasingly a target for therapeutic intervention. Two highly polymorphic loci play critical roles, namely the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system, which is the human version of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and the Killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) that are relevant for responses of natural killer (NK) and some subsets of T cells. Their accurate classification has typically required the use of dedicated biological specimens and a combination of in vitro and in silico efforts. Increased availability of next generation sequencing data has led to the development of ancillary computational solutions. Here, we report an evaluation of recently published algorithms to computationally infer complex immunogenetic variation in the form of HLA alleles and KIR haplotypes from whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing data. For both HLA allele and KIR gene typing, we identified tools that yielded >97% overall accuracy for four-digit HLA types, and >99% overall accuracy for KIR gene presence, suggesting the readiness of in silico solutions for use in clinical and high-throughput research settings.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesExome SequencingGene FrequencyGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHLA AntigensHumansImmunogeneticsPhenotypeReceptors, KIRWhole Genome SequencingHLA AntigensReceptors, KIRclinical sequencingHLAimmunogeneticsimputationKIRwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32940337
PMCPMC8138874
OpenAlexW3087389975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.