Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32940014›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2020

Weight loss over time and survival: a landmark analysis of 1000+ prospectively treated and monitored lung cancer patients.

Jennifer Le-Rademacher, Camden Lopez, Eric Wolfe, Nathan R Foster, Sumithra J Mandrekar, Xiaofei Wang, Rajiv Kumar, Alex Adjei, Aminah Jatoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Cancer cachexia: a caregiver and advocate perspective.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diversity in chemotherapy-induced cachexia.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer Le-RademacherDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Camden LopezAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eric WolfeDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nathan R FosterDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sumithra J MandrekarDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Xiaofei WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Rajiv KumarDivision of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alex AdjeiDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aminah JatoiDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1081-189X

Funding

Repurposing Disulfiram: A Novel Strategy to Help Cancer Patients Regain MuscleR01CA195473 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI FERNANDEZ-ZAPICO, MARTIN ERNESTO, JATOI, AMINAH · 2015 to 2020
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEligibility criteria and endpoints for cancer cachexia trials-and whether weight loss should be included-remain controversial. Although most cachexia trials enrol patients after initial cancer diagnosis, few studies have addressed whether weight loss well after a cancer diagnosis is prognostic.

methodsWe pooled data from non-small cell lung cancer patients from prospectively conducted trials within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (1998-2008), a nationally funded infrastructure. We examined (i) weight data availability and weight changes and (ii) survival.

resultsA total of 822 patients were examined. Of these, 659 (80%) were on treatment at the beginning of Cycle 2 of chemotherapy; weight was available for 656 (80%). By Cycles 3 and 4, weight was available for 448 (55%) and 384 (47%), respectively. From baseline to immediately prior to Cycle 2, 208 (32%) gained weight; 225 (34%) lost <2% of baseline weight; and 223 (34% of 656) lost 2% or more. Median survival from the beginning of Cycle 2 was 13.0, 10.9, and 6.9 months for patients with weight gain, weight loss of <2%, and weight loss of 2% or more, respectively. In multivariate analyses, adjusted for age, sex, performance score, type of treatment, and body mass index, weight loss of 2% or more was associated with poor overall survival compared with weight gain [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-2.07; P < 0.001] and compared with weight loss of <2% (HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27-1.95; P < 0.001). Although weight loss of <2% was not associated with poorer overall survival compared with weight gain, it was associated with poorer progression-free survival (HR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01-1.51; P = 0.036). Similar findings were observed in a separate 255-patient validation cohort.

conclusionsWeight should be integrated into cancer cachexia trials because of its ease of frequent measurement and sustained prognostic association.

Indexed as

CachexiaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsWeight LossFemaleHumansMalePrognosisLandmark analysisLung cancerPrognosisSurvivalWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID32940014
PMCPMC7749536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.